If both of last year's Finals teams go down in the 2nd round...

[msgkings322]

...do they need to make big changes? Lotta chatter here on the radio says yes and it sounds like some of you Boston fans think the same.

Brown for Wiggins, Poole, Kuminga, and picks....who says no?

 

[bksballer89]

Yes the Warriors should trade steph

 

[msgkings322]

Yes the Warriors should trade steph

Obviously. But who says no to the trade I proposed?

 

[bksballer89]

Obviously. But who says no to the trade I proposed?

No way that money matches

 

[msgkings322]

No way that money matches

Ah yes...maybe the Celtics include salary filler too. Besides the money matching, is this a good deal for the teams to make? I'd be into it for sure

 

[CitySushi]

I think it just shows how incredibly tough it is to make it back to the finals. Every year other teams are getting better too.

Changes are probably needed but it might not be as drastic as teams might think.

 

[msgkings322]

@The Q , thoughts?

 

[The Q]

...do they need to make big changes? Lotta chatter here on the radio says yes and it sounds like some of you Boston fans think the same.

Brown for Wiggins, Poole, Kuminga, and picks....who says no?

Boston doesn’t want poole

Brown also doesn’t make enough that you need poole iirc. His new extension wouldn’t be now it would be next summer

 

[msgkings322]

I think it just shows how incredibly tough it is to make it back to the finals. Every year other teams are getting better too.

Changes are probably needed but it might not be as drastic as teams might think.

For sure, in this parity era I don't expect much repeating. Last year any number of teams could have won and the Warriors did, they weren't dominant over the rest of the league. Same thing this year, just about any of the final 8 could plausibly win.

Just proposing a big deal to see what people think. Would you do that deal?

 

[msgkings322]

Boston doesn’t want poole

Brown also doesn’t make enough that you need poole iirc. His new extension wouldn’t be now it would be next summer

Would they trade Brown for Wiggins, Kuminga, and picks?

 

[The Q]

@The Q , thoughts?

I don’t know how you can bring mazzulla back if he loses a series that should’ve been in over in 5

I told you game 5 vs atl was a big deal

Idk what bostkn needs

It needs bob to not have his head up his ass

And their defense is too come and go.

Idk what move they can make, or should make. I just don’t see how they get better either

So they’re kinda stuck.

 

[msgkings322]

I don’t know how you can bring mazzulla back if he loses a series that should’ve been in over in 5

I told you game 5 vs atl was a big deal

Idk what bostkn needs

It needs bob to not have his head up his ass

And their defense is too come and go.

Idk what move they can make, or should make. I just don’t see how they get better either

So they’re kinda stuck.

Don't disagree with much here, just curious if you liked my proposed trade.

 

[The Q]

Would they trade Brown for Wiggins, Kuminga, and picks?

I think they can get a serious return from the Knicks or jazz for brown

Maybe the thunder since brown is still young enough

But I’m not sure what Boston does.

They can get something for grant in a sign and trade and then make one last big swing before they’re capped out of aggregation trades and the mle


Which reminds me, new rules means I don’t think this trade can actually happen anymore

Nba killing it’s own trade market is pretty brutal

 

[The Q]

Don't disagree with much here, just curious if you liked my proposed trade.

I had to think about it, not sure it’s even legal with new cba

 

[CitySushi]

Would they trade Brown for Wiggins, Kuminga, and picks?

I think it's tough, but I might lean towards yes for the Warriors. But I haven't really looked at many other options, so not sure if that's the best one on the table.

 

[msgkings322]

I think it's tough, but I might lean towards yes for the Warriors. But I haven't really looked at many other options, so not sure if that's the best one on the table.

According to Q it may not even be possible under the new CBA. I never understood that stuff in detail and now I really don't. But to me that seems like a big win for the Ws at the expense of the far future (Kuminga)

Then they can pay Brown when Dray and Klay are off the books?

 

[CitySushi]

According to Q it may not even be possible under the new CBA. I never understood that stuff in detail and now I really don't. But to me that seems like a big win for the Ws at the expense of the far future (Kuminga)

Then they can pay Brown when Dray and Klay are off the books?

Well the thing for me to really question is why is he unhappy in Boston? Talent wise, he'd be a huge upgrade to any team. But even if we trade for Brown, the Warriors still have the same holes and tbh, I'm not sure Boston get's any better. Both teams are in win-now mode.

 

[The Q]

According to Q it may not even be possible under the new CBA. I never understood that stuff in detail and now I really don't. But to me that seems like a big win for the Ws at the expense of the far future (Kuminga)

Then they can pay Brown when Dray and Klay are off the books?

The warriors need to be under that second apron to make a trade like this.

That is almost certainly not possible with Dray staying.

 

[ElPatron1]

Brown for Darius Garland makes the most sense

They have 2 SF's and need a PG. The Cavs have 2 PG's and need a SF. Logical swap that benefits both teams imo

 

[tlance]

Obviously. But who says no to the trade I proposed?

Both teams probably.

Why you so quick to trade Wiggins always?