Wamu
whats-a-matta-u?
But you can say that about a lot of teams. Outside of this team, who has that team played. I'd bet at least half of the Top 25 ranked teams haven't played more than one good team. It's still too early in the season. And also what is considered a good team, if you discount Maryland because their wins were vs bad teams, that discounts a lot of teams. The list of teams who have beaten TWO good teams who also beat at least one good team, is pretty slim, and then we also get into the whole, why are they considered good, because they were ranked preseason? Then teams come along and beat them and it's a quality win whether they are actually good or not? I'm thinking specifically of the Pac getting credit for beating Baylor, BYU, Wisconsin & Michigan St when all 4 were ranked or maybe Wisconsin was just getting votes, but all 4 of those teams have shown themselves to have been way overrated. Do any of those 4 have a winning record even? So then another Pac team beats a conf opponent that is ranked high because they beat one of those 4 teams, and they get ranked high despite the fact the Pac team they beat may not have been all that good since the supposedly good team they beat ended up not being that good. I'm hoping the Selection Committee takes all of these kinds of things into consideration when they put out their rankings.
Come on man. I've mentioned this before.
Paragraph's, figure out how to use them.