MilkSpiller22
Gorilla
Yep, I agree it's clear this must be different than any other fumble that goes out of bounds. while I get your argument not sure how you are rewarding the O for letting them keep a ball that they already had, but you want to reward the D far more even though they never recovered the ball and often did nothing to cause the fumble. and that's fine if your opinion. But not a crazy notion to prefer the D earn the ball for something they did and not just because a ball went out of bounds a few inches further up the field.
Yes, get in end zone with the ball the drive ends, just disagree with the notion it's "not part of the field"
what I mean by not part of the field(which is probably the wrong way to say it) is simply that the goal is to get in there... you cant progress in there, that's where the drive ends...
do you realize that you a proposing a drive that extends AFTER it ends???
Penalties act as NO PLAY...