michaeljordan_fan
Well-Known Member
So says the pheg that went searching for my post.
I didn't search for anything. You're confused.
So says the pheg that went searching for my post.
FUCKING QUOTE THE BET YOU GOD DAMNED TARD because I proved EXACTLY what I said I would. In duplicate. It's a fact.YOU HAVE YET TO PROVE HE SAID THAT. Literally you have not shown one shred of evidence that he said UO would beat UW. Not one shred.
But I can see you literally are too much of an egotistical prick to admit you are wrong. It’s people like you that deserve to be shot.
Putting Oregon as PAC North champ isn’t stating UW would lose to Oregon. Find that, and it’s a deal. Heck you can have my avi until Jan 1. It’s just a fucking avy anyway.
Look you complete waste of space, this is the thing you said I was laying about. THIS quote right here
I get you aren't smart enough to accept he believed Oregon was going to beat UW and win the North as part of that I can't say I'm much surprised.
I literally have no time, but I'll give it another go. House full of people here to watch the game and I still have chili to finish up.I quoted the first 3 posts that got me to respond to you on this. An yet you somehow think this is a UU and UO conference championship bet? Come on man, just admit you were wrong.
Asked for him to show something where he said UW was going to win. Left all kinds of room for maybe I missed something. Knew he didn't add anything to the team board this week and didn't have his normal 'UW is going to pump them like a cheap whore at the back of a motel 6' or whatever when he feels like a win is coming. The fact he said nothing at all told me he wasn't high on the team after the Stanford loss and didn't want to listen to UW fans when he talks about Oregon.Quote? I don't remember AG saying UW was going to win. If he made a prediction I missed it because he's stayed out of that discussion this week and I believe he penciled it in as a loss before the season started.
Pulling more bullshit out of your ass again? Shocked I tell you.
So clearly it was good enough for me to accept he wasn't high on UW with his picks of Oregon and Utah. Really doesn't matter if it's not something anyone else agrees with. I was entirely fine with using that and said it clearly.He picked Oregon and Utah for the CCG before the season started, so yes I can say that. He banged that drum all off season.
I literally have no time, but I'll give it another go. House full of people here to watch the game and I still have chili to finish up.
Asked for him to show something where he said UW was going to win. Left all kinds of room for maybe I missed something. Knew he didn't add anything to the team board this week and didn't have his normal 'UW is going to pump them like a cheap whore at the back of a motel 6' or whatever when he feels like a win is coming. The fact he said nothing at all told me he wasn't high on the team after the Stanford loss and didn't want to listen to UW fans when he talks about Oregon.
Sure, he said it at some point. Doesn't 'disprove' what I said above. I left room for things I missed you stupid fuck.
So clearly it was good enough for me to accept he wasn't high on UW with his picks of Oregon and Utah. Really doesn't matter if it's not something anyone else agrees with. I was entirely fine with using that and said it clearly.
Now, I have guests and I'll finish kicking your ass later tonight.
I am a bit surprised this is still going on. We have a post showing that AG picked UW to beat UO. Should be case closed at this point.
UW has a bye before they play Utah in Seattle. The Utes on the other hand have Cal next Saturday before they play at Husky Stadium the following week. UW is 12 - 1 vs Utah all time.
That was my point, if U-dub beats Utah, that will give USC the inside track on winning the South.UW has a bye before they play Utah in Seattle. The Utes on the other hand have Cal next Saturday before they play at Husky Stadium the following week. UW is 12 - 1 vs Utah all time.
My bad it was this motherfvcker @TheLonestarDUCK who couldn't mind his own damn business.So says the pheg that went searching for my post.
Yep, you did another tard.@WizardHawk here you are
In what fucking way we’re we not betting AG thought UO would beat UW?
An the only thing you proved is how much of a jackass you are.
If you really want me to spend an hour plus digging through bullshit you have to make it worth my while. 1 month avi bet and we get at least 3 days to look for those posts. We find at least one example where he has Oregon v Utah in the CCG this season and we own your avi.
You have yet to show a post I got wrong. Not one. At all. Ever.AG is even wearing the avy. Wizhawky is being a stubborn because he got it wrong and can’t admit it.
Yep, you did another tard.
Here is the bet I agreed to. In writing. Spelled out directly.
It was spelled out plainly. That is what I agreed to. Period. Stop. You of course won't stand by it because I did indeed prove that to be correct.
You punked out. Not surprisingly.
Putting Oregon as PAC North champ isn’t stating UW would lose to Oregon. Find that, and it’s a deal. Heck you can have my avi until Jan 1. It’s just a fucking avy anyway.
You have yet to show a post I got wrong. Not one. At all. Ever.
What I claimed I backed up. Posted direct irrefutable factual proof.
Had I claimed he hasn't ever put UW over the ducks, you'd have something. That wasn't said. Had I said I would take your version of the bet you'd have something. I didn't because it was based on something I never said in the first place.
He picked Oregon and Utah for the CCG before the season started, so yes I can say that. He banged that drum all off season.
Direct quote where I agreed to that. RIGHT FUCKING NOW you lying sack of shit. I gave you the ONLY fucking quote where I agreed to a bet. And it had nothing to do with that.The only bet made with you is that you stated AG stated UO would beat UW.
You haven't posted a single fucking relevant quote you idiot.I have 9 pages of you being wrong. You have yet to post any evidence just hearsay.
You did state that, in the very first post you responded to me. Do I really need to post that again?