How about you don't reply to my post seeing how you're a doorknob imo.How about posting an article that predicts something different? Whats the point of posting article after article that say the same teams are favored to win their division?
How about you don't reply to my post seeing how you're a doorknob imo.
I didn't even bother to read your post. You need to get this in your head: 'I don't like you.'Seriously though. I'm not trying to be an ass. But they predict the same thing USC in the south and the Huskies in the north. Why do we need to see every single one if they all predict the same thing? Do you read them at all? Whats the point of that? How many times are you going to post the amount of returning starters each team has?
I didn't even bother to read your post. You need to get this in your head: 'I don't like you.'
i mean to be fair are there articles that are predicting something else?How about posting an article that predicts something different? Whats the point of posting article after article that say the same teams are favored to win their division?
i mean to be fair are there articles that are predicting something else?
Sorry but left alone we just get more and more. It was worse before and it's somewhat tolerable now but can't let that shit slide. Most of his posts dont even belong in the conference thread but when he can't remember or didn't read and posts basically the same shit over and over someone has to say somethingI mean 20 more posts complaining about his repeated on topic, but often duplicated posts sure doesn't help make the thread any more desirable.
Not that I haven't been in my share of pissing matches that drone on a few pages at the expense of the rest of the Pac12 fans.
Sorry but left alone we just get more and more. It was worse before and it's somewhat tolerable now but can't let that shit slide. Most of his posts dont even belong in the conference thread but when he can't remember or didn't read and posts basically the same shit over and over someone has to say something
i mean to be fair are there articles that are predicting something else?
Would it make much of a difference if there were national sources picking USC to win the conference at this point? It's all nothing but click bait and best guesses. We know things will change substantially from these lists. Some teams will rise up higher and some will fail to live up to their billing.True, but TBH I don't even know who will be starting at QB for USC. The only one I can remember seeing play a down was Daniels but it was in High School, I know Fink played a little last year but it was pretty limited. And if I had to guess I would pick Sears to be the starter in game one. But despite the uncertainty most of the publications have already picked USC to win the South, and finish third behind Stanford and Washington.
I would be interested in reading something new, but we're still kind of in the no news is good news stage of football. About the only time you'll really hear anything is if something bad happened like a star athlete outside of a bar at 2 in the morning.
If there's one thing anyone should have learned about this board it's that calling people out only makes them do it more. It doesn't slow any of it down at all.
You and I have gone on for days as neither ever really backs down. Do you honestly think calling out AG makes him suddenly become a compliant forum member? In fact I'm surprised you didn't get more of the crying doll or petersen pics. It's what he does.