- Thread starter
- #121
huskers1217
Well-Known Member
Maybe should to wait until that happens before you talk shit though...just saying.
Ding ding sauce.
Maybe should to wait until that happens before you talk shit though...just saying.
They would be tough for the other team. I realize being a Bama fan you don't know about these things called home and home. And just so you know there have been seasons USC travels twice for OCC games (get this) in the same season. I know , mind blowing huh. LOL
If OSU had played Kansas instead of OU they'd be in the playoff . You know, so does everyone here
PS: I'd rather travel all the way to California to your calm stadiums rather than not leave the state and play @ Auburn. Your stadiums/homefield advantage seem weak if we are being honest.
Yes it is. @Voltaire26 handed it out.That avi isn't from your MSU/OSU bet series, is it?
Yes it is. @Voltaire26 handed it out.
LOL, you wouldn't know b/c you have never been to a game.
LOL, you wouldn't know b/c you have never been to a game.
You do love your “pecker” avys.Ah. That makes sense. I was going to lose my shit if a Buckeye fan had you wear that.
I will say, you paid your debt to me right in the nick of time. I've since come up with my "pecker love" series of avis.
You know, every time I see your avi, I think of Maryland. Then I laugh.
Even more mind blowing...there have been seasons where USC stayed home for every OOC game.....WOW, who would have thought it was even possible.
Let me guess...you're a fine arts major or something otherwise fluffy and not a math major.
Just don't schedule Liberty. They can fuck up a season.
A 12-1 conference champ has never missed the playoff and that certainly wasn't changing with a 12-1 OSU. I know fans don't want to hear it but tough OOC games are high risk , low reward . You can't control much in your schedule so you certainly don't need to play tough OOC games especially if you're a blue blood. There's no point to itDoubt it. Maybe if they'd played Kansas instead of Iowa. . .
A 12-1 conference champ has never missed the playoff and that certainly wasn't changing with a 12-1 OSU. I know fans don't want to hear it but tough OOC games are high risk , low reward . You can't control much in your schedule so you certainly don't need to play tough OOC games especially if you're a blue blood. There's no point to it
A 12-1 conference champ has never missed the playoff and that certainly wasn't changing with a 12-1 OSU. I know fans don't want to hear it but tough OOC games are high risk , low reward . You can't control much in your schedule so you certainly don't need to play tough OOC games especially if you're a blue blood. There's no point to it
That is probably true "every" other year. USC travels to South Bend every other year to play Notre Dame in an OOC game. Next year USC will travel to Austin Texas to play the Longhorns in an OOC game, in a "home and home" series.Even more mind blowing...there have been seasons where USC stayed home for every OOC game.....WOW, who would have thought it was even possible.
Let me guess...you're a fine arts major or something otherwise fluffy and not a math major.
2014 OSU got clubbed at home by a shitty VT team, 2015 Bama got torched by a pedestrian Ole Miss, 2017 Clemson lost to a 4-8 team . Teams lose games . What they can't do is lose more than 1. That's why you're stupid to voluntarily schedule one you could lose. When you're Bama, OSU, USC etc you're getting in with 1 loss. Doesn't matter who it's to ( see Clemson this year or last ). That's a HUGE advantage most programs don't have wasting it is insaneNot sure I'm buying. When that 1 loss is from being dilated by an unranked Iowa, I don't know what to make of it.
Anyway, if they hadn't have gotten bent over a barrel by FUCKING Iowa, they'd be a 12-1 B1G Champ whos only loss was to OU. If 12-1 would be good enough without OU in the schedule, it definitely would with them.
It's not about that . OSU/USC are going to play good teams every year . They don't need to schedule extra ones. Not if they want to make the playoff anyway"If we avoid playing good teams, then people won't know we're not that good until we're in the playoffs."
That doesn't sound appealing to me.