Yo Tee
Well-Known Member
Please show me where you said this exact position. I’ll wait.
Post #300.
Please show me where you said this exact position. I’ll wait.
I’m telling you exactly that. Brady and Wilson had nothing to do with how their defenses play. It sounds great, but it’s BS. Now it would be different if KC was leaving the defense with short fields to defend regularly, but that is not the case. At all.Obviously KC can't do a lot, but you're telling me Brady doesn't have anything to do with making the Patriots defense better? Or Russell Wilson didn't have anything to do with making Seattle's defense better? I don't think so. QBs who are the leader of the team help everywhere they can.
I’m telling you exactly that. Brady and Wilson had nothing to do with how their defenses play. It sounds great, but it’s BS. Now it would be different if KC was leaving the defense with short fields to defend regularly, but that is not the case. At all.
Well picking at 17 or 18 would probably mean we have about an 8-8 record, so your contradicting yourself then
That,too, is BS. If you got a defense that just doesn’t have the talent (or coaching) then no motivation can overcome that defect over the long haul. That is just an excuse from the ABCers. You watch too many Hollywood sports movies.I don't agree. QB is the leader/captain of the team, he should motivate the entire team.
Sorry, but what you said in that post is no where close to what HTTR posted.Post #300.
Sorry, but what you said in that post is no where close to what HTTR posted.
That,too, is BS. If you got a defense that just doesn’t have the talent (or coaching) then no motivation can overcome that defect over the long haul. That is just an excuse from the ABCers. You watch too many Hollywood sports movies.
How so?
You have said he’s a .500 qb and needs to be replaced. Now you say if we’re drafting at around 18 (probably .500) then we don’t need to replace= contradiction
Most of the players aren’t worth the money they’re making but that’s the businessI didn't say he needs to be replaced, I said he isn't worth the money he's probably gonna make next year and I said that he's not a top priority when it comes to changing things.
So do you consider Brees a top tier QB? Rivers? I could go on.....I disagree. I also hate sports movies.
Most of the players aren’t worth the money they’re making but that’s the business
You have said, or insinuated, that he should be replaced. He is not worth the money. He is a stat machine (what ever that is). He is not a leader, etc. if you believe that, why would you keep him?I didn't say he needs to be replaced, I said he isn't worth the money he's probably gonna make next year and I said that he's not a top priority when it comes to changing things.
So do you consider Brees a top tier QB? Rivers? I could go on.....
You have said, or insinuated, that he should be replaced. He is not worth the money. He is a stat machine (what ever that is). He is not a leader, etc. if you believe that, why would you keep him?
So basically we are back to the tried and true
Kirk aint worth the money it will take to keep him. He isnt whats wrong with the team, but you could do better for less. And at the end of the day, if he cant carry the team, you might be better off moving on any way.
#InANutShell
You forgot the part about him needing better pieces around him.
Would having AB, Zeke and Gronk suddenly MAKE Kirk worth #30M a year??
My take is the line of "reasoning" would be.. with the level of talent we have, Kirk is not needed.
If Kirk Cousins has the right team around him and the Redskins were winning division titles and playoff games and contenders for the Super Bowl, there'd be no question he's worth that much and there's no way someone would be stupid enough to split that team up. (right?) Especially if he keeps putting up the stats he's putting up now. But those stats aren't equaling out to wins and that's what matters the most, or at least should matter.