WR at 17 the Case for that pick

[Buffalo_Nickel_1]

short and simple if skins lose garcon and djax to free agencie we would have to go wr with the first pick we can not pass on wr ross at 17 in this case and if this happens look for 2 wr picks one with the first pick and maybe a 4rd or a 3rd i dont see any free agent better then djax or garcon

 

[deanpet21]

short and simple if skins lose garcon and djax to free agencie we would have to go wr with the first pick we can not pass on wr ross at 17 in this case and if this happens look for 2 wr picks one with the first pick and maybe a 4rd or a 3rd i dont see any free agent better then djax or garcon

Williams could be interesting at #17. Do you see Fournette falling to #17?

 

[skinsdad62]

if we are picking offense without KC as the qb we will fall farther into the depths

 

[deanpet21]

if we are picking offense without KC as the qb we will fall farther into the depths

So you pass on Fourneet at #17?

 

[skinsdad62]

So you pass on Fourneet at #17?

depends on what is available on defense . this is a deep RB class i may wait depending on who is the on defense

 

[deanpet21]

depends on what is available on defense . this is a deep RB class i may wait depending on who is the on defense

Give me the names on defense.

 

[skinsdad62]

Give me the names on defense.

any d/line ILB or safety projected in that area hooker i wouldnt pass on nor would i pass on adams or cunningham

 

[deanpet21]

any d/line ILB or safety projected in that area hooker i wouldnt pass on nor would i pass on adams or cunningham

hooker and adams are long gone before 17. Cunningham may not be a 1st round pick. The dlineman that should be there are Brantley and Mcdowell.

 

[skinsdad62]

hooker and adams are long gone before 17. Cunningham may not be a 1st round pick. The dlineman that should be there are Brantley and Mcdowell.

yeah just like we wouldnt take sherf too you dont know

 

[Stymietee]

So you pass on Fourneet at #17?

I would not take Fournette at #17 even if he was there waiting for us to do it. Don't get me wrong Fournette is a great back, but for our needs we HAVE to go WR or Defense with that pick. What I wouldn't do is pass on Mixon in round 2. To me while Fournette is a great runner, Mixon is the greater all around back. He is without a doubt the best, runner, pass catching, blocking combination RB, in this draft.

 

[deanpet21]

I would not take Fournette at #17 even if he was there waiting for us to do it. Don't get me wrong Fournette is a great back, but for our needs we HAVE to go WR or Defense with that pick. What I wouldn't do is pass on Mixon in round 2. To me while Fournette is a great runner, Mixon is the greater all around back. He is without a doubt the best, runner, pass catching, blocking combination RB, in this draft.

I agree on Mixon but he can get suspended b/c of off field issues. we don't know. If WR and defense is fixed in FA I don't know how you can pass up Fournette. I know he is not a complete back but he is just a stud.

 

[ehb5]

I really like Corey Davis but Im not sure itd be the best use of that pick just because we NEED help elsewhere.

 

[ehb5]

I really like Corey Davis but Im not sure itd be the best use of that pick just because we NEED help elsewhere.

 

[ehb5]

Same with Cook. Hes really good IMO and our offense could be awesome but a 1st round RB makes me cringe a little.

 

[deanpet21]

Same with Cook. Hes really good IMO and our offense could be awesome but a 1st round RB makes me cringe a little.

We cant really say until FA has happened. A lot of holes could get plugged in FA.

 

[Stymietee]

I agree on Mixon but he can get suspended b/c of off field issues. we don't know. If WR and defense is fixed in FA I don't know how you can pass up Fournette. I know he is not a complete back but he is just a stud.

I don't disagree with most of what you're saying, however, I've followed Mixon for a while now and like most of us he's has no relatable issues since that which happened during his 18th-19th year of life. He's come a long way from that time in his life.

To me maximizing our draft means getting the most bang for the pick, getting the best RB in the draft with the 2nd round pick does exactly that.

 

[deanpet21]

I don't disagree with most of what you're saying, however, I've followed Mixon for a while now and like most of us he's has no relatable issues since that which happened during his 18th-19th year of life. He's come a long way from that time in his life.

To me maximizing our draft means getting the most bang for the pick, getting the best RB in the draft with the 2nd round pick does exactly that.

Can Mixon be suspended by the NFL b/c of past actions?

 

[Stymietee]

Can Mixon be suspended by the NFL b/c of past actions?

No, unless they want to mess with us again. The problem with doing something like that is they have no legal jurisdictional claim on retroactively punishing him for a long passed indiscretion. The lawsuits would come from the players union, his legal reps and the team lawyers, and they would win out because of what I said above.

 

[ehb5]

I don't disagree with most of what you're saying, however, I've followed Mixon for a while now and like most of us he's has no relatable issues since that which happened during his 18th-19th year of life. He's come a long way from that time in his life.

To me maximizing our draft means getting the most bang for the pick, getting the best RB in the draft with the 2nd round pick does exactly that.

I don't disagree with most of what you're saying, however, I've followed Mixon for a while now and like most of us he's has no relatable issues since that which happened during his 18th-19th year of life. He's come a long way from that time in his life.

To me maximizing our draft means getting the most bang for the pick, getting the best RB in the draft with the 2nd round pick does exactly that.

The 2nd seems rich to me. Theres still talk of him going undrafted. Plus he seems like an ahole. Im very torn on him.

 

[deanpet21]

No, unless they want to mess with us again. The problem with doing something like that is they have no legal jurisdictional claim on retroactively punishing him for a long passed indiscretion. The lawsuits would come from the players union, his legal reps and the team lawyers, and they would win out because of what I said above.

So why isn't he a projected 1st round pick?