Whos the better QB- blind resume

[Wazmankg]

Ok im an idiot lol

Its 4 MORE turnovers not 11

11 is the total for QB1

Sorry yall

Feel free to change your vote

That's better.

 

[rmilia1]

Are you sure the fumbles you counted for the TO stat were strictly fumbles lost?

I screwed up. See above ^^^ lol

11 is the toyal turnovers for QB1. 4 more than QB2

 

[Balljim55]

as a Panthers fan I will gladly take either

 

[Ojb81]

If i give you that you'll know who they are though lol

QB2 has a higher win% this year and career

Qb1: justin fields
Qb2: daniel jones

 

[rmilia1]

Qb1: justin fields
Qb2: daniel jones

You sneaky bastard lol

 

[Fountain City Blues]

Without knowing how the turnovers happened, it's hard to say for sure. But I am awfully curious about QB1. TD creation is more important to me than turnovers as a general rule if the difference is granular.

 

[fightinfunbags]

Without knowing how the turnovers happened, it's hard to say for sure. But I am awfully curious about QB1. TD creation is more important to me than turnovers as a general rule if the difference is granular.

And if the player is in a developmental stage (looks like it’s Fields) you could possibly coach turnovers out of the player. You can at least get better at reducing them as player gets more experience.

 

[Robotech]

I'd rather have Fields. Jones is on a better team, so Fields is at a handicap when comparing stats. And Fields will improve more than Jones.

 

[fightinfunbags]

I'd rather have Fields. Jones is on a better team, so Fields is at a handicap when comparing stats. And Fields will improve more than Jones.

That’s why the blind comparison stuff can be flawed. One guy is still developing. The other guy is on the back end of his developmental stage though more Gabol may get an even better QB out of Jones. I’m still taking the upside of Fields.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

And if the player is in a developmental stage (looks like it’s Fields) you could possibly coach turnovers out of the player. You can at least get better at reducing them as player gets more experience.

It's probably worth noting Fields has low-key been one of the better QB's in the NFL since week 7. Can make an argument he's figuring it out more and more, albeit on a really bad Bears team.

Wouldn't be surprised if the Bears a trendy team next season. Good draft position and a large warchest to work with.

 

[eaglesnut]

Without knowing how the turnovers happened, it's hard to say for sure. But I am awfully curious about QB1. TD creation is more important to me than turnovers as a general rule if the difference is granular.

You must love Carson Wentz

 

[Fountain City Blues]

You must love Carson Wentz

He has never been a creator outside of a flukey 3rd down fueled season. A 3rd down number he has *never* come close to replicating, or anything 2017 in general.

 

[Ojb81]

You sneaky bastard lol

I was right? Holy shit, talk about a shot in the dark lol. I mean, I DID think about for about a minute or so, but I was in no way 100% certain of my answer being correct lol!

 

[rmilia1]

I'd rather have Fields. Jones is on a better team, so Fields is at a handicap when comparing stats. And Fields will improve more than Jones.

I think it's debatable that Fields is on a worse team personally. Coming into this season the teams were basically seen as the same

 

[jarntt]

Ok im an idiot lol

Its 4 MORE turnovers not 11

11 is the total for QB1

Sorry yall

Feel free to change your vote

OK now I got it. It just wasn’t possible with 11 more because only so many QB even had 400 rushing yards and the only one that was reasonably possible to have 11 more turnovers was Allen and the rest of the numbers didn’t match up with anyone

 

[Fountain City Blues]

I think it's debatable that Fields is on a worse team personally. Coming into this season the teams were basically seen as the same

Has Daniel Jones ever had a 8-9 week stretch as good as Fields has been on right now?

 

[rmilia1]

Has Daniel Jones ever had a 8-9 week stretch as good as Fields has been on right now?

I mean.... i guess I'm not really sure how you qualify a great 8 wewk run

Fields average game the last 8 weels is 210 ypg and a 93 QB rating. He's got 12 TDs/ 6 Ints . He has ran it very well though.

I think people are going a little overboard on just how good Fields has been the last 2 months

But some people value QB run game more than i do so i get why they may see it differently

 

[Fountain City Blues]

I mean.... i guess I'm not really sure how you qualify a great 8 wewk run

Fields average game the last 8 weels is 210 ypg and a 93 QB rating. He's got 12 TDs/ 6 Ints . He has ran it very well though.

I think people are going a little overboard on just how good Fields has been the last 2 months

But some people value QB run game more than i do so i get why they may see it differently

Fields' EPA/Play is .185/Play in that span since week 7. That'd rank 8th behind Joe Burrow right now if protracted over a full season. That's with some pretty dogshit weapons and constantly being put in bad spots by a terrible defense. It's a SSS, but it'd be hard to put the bust label on him. Daniel Jones best scenario is probably early 2010's Alex Smith. We have a better idea of what Jones is, imo.

 

[Schmoopy1000]

I mean.... i guess I'm not really sure how you qualify a great 8 wewk run

Fields average game the last 8 weels is 210 ypg and a 93 QB rating. He's got 12 TDs/ 6 Ints . He has ran it very well though.

I think people are going a little overboard on just how good Fields has been the last 2 months

But some people value QB run game more than i do so i get why they may see it differently

Fields sucks as a QB.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

Fields sucks as a QB.

Too early to say that, imo. He was really bad early in the season. He looks like a player the past couple months. He's earned another year as the undisputed starter in Chicago, imo. If he can't produce better passing numbers with a serious NFL surrounding cast offensively, then I'll hop on the wagon. Not until then for now.