Oh please, that's exactly wrong. Those QBs aren't franchise QBs, build the roster with this draft ( plenty of important positions loaded with talent) THEN draft a franchise QB in 2023. Roll with Lock and maybe a FA QB like Huntley this season.
There is way WAY to many flaws in all these supposed top QB's. Hell they were saying "if QB wasn't so over drafted these guys wouldn't be picked in the first 3 rounds!" Why waste a 1st on a 4th round QB talent just because there is NO TALENT there! No!
Or they could be terrible ( seems almost certain). Good draft for OL, DL and those are positions of need for Seahawks ( many teams actually) and this year they have the draft position to fill those positions with premium talent,can't let that go by without taking advanage of it.
True. But I find these accusations to be superfluous. We don't really know much about the details of these athletes' personal lives.
No you cannot and you can't have too many guys along the OL. Hold a competition in camp for the 5 spots up front and the guys who show the coaches the most in camp will start
I agree with this other than 1 first round player on the Oline Or DLine doesn't make you better, but the possibility of 3 First round picks making your team better is Much more likely. Trade that #1 for a 2nd ( we would have three 2nd round picks then for 2022 ) and a first in 2023. ( we would then have three 1st's and two 2nds in 2023 ) gained a 2nd round pick this year and a 1st round pick Next year in what should be a MUCH better QB draft class. Five picks in the first 64 players taken ... YES PLEASE! Turn that 3% into 8%
willis is a project and pickett has baby hands. this is a shit draft for QB and a good draft for DE, OT, and CB
I won't hate the idea but not sure it would be the best course. Seahawks have a early pick where the cream is in a draft, trading it for a second ( the really good cream is gone ) and a first which is likely a late first ( where the cream has been skimmed already) isn't ideal and this is a strong draft for OL and DL and next year that may not be the case. I'd much rather they draft OL/DL and get a player who's matters for the next decade.
oh boy am I getting greedy!
Your working under the assumption that it's possible to get someone to bite, it may be possible or teams may figure next years draft is where the best bet is. The teams you mentioned all pick ahead of Seahawks already so I highly doubt that your dream could be pulled off.They will have a early pick next season with out a doubt also and I am trading that first this year to a team like Atlanta, New York ( Either one ) Detroit. I am no fool. I'm not trading my 1st to Tampa or Greenbay! It would be going to a Non-playoff contender. Also lets not forget a HIGH 2nd round pick "this year" equates to a 1st next year if traded
Just dont see anyone making that tradeThey will have a early pick next season with out a doubt also and I am trading that first this year to a team like Atlanta, New York ( Either one ) Detroit. I am no fool. I'm not trading my 1st to Tampa or Greenbay! It would be going to a Non-playoff contender. Also lets not forget a HIGH 2nd round pick "this year" equates to a 1st next year if traded
Oh no shit but that doesn't mean I don't chase after it. Denver getting Russell Wilson as their QB was a fooking dream also but look how that worked out and they UNDER paid for him. Three fooking firsts for Watson!?! really? I guess maybe age is a bigger factor than character and success. Trades are never easy to work out because one team always wants to win so 9 times out of 10 it's best not to play. I am sure you understand what i mean by that, a team will always walk away if they don't get the best deal in their eyes ( Unless your Seattle ).
Can't have it both ways. Either he was an overrated QB and his success relied far more on the LOB and Beast Mode than the media let on
What "both ways"? I don't even know what you are talking about.
