- Thread starter
- #61
y2ktors
New Member
Jerry West should be there someplace, probably instead of Kidd.
West was a 2-guard.
Jerry West should be there someplace, probably instead of Kidd.
What's your guys rankings for top 4 PGs of all time?
Dude averaged a triple-double one season. Came very close in a couple of others. Say what you want about inflated numbers, but he was no doubt one of the best of that era. Oscar would be successful in any era.
I have posted a thread with era adjusted stats and it was no where near a triple double. He was great though.
I have posted a thread with era adjusted stats and it was no where near a triple double. He was great though.
Fact is, Oscar averaged a triple-double one season. Your era adjusted stats mean nothing.
I get what you are saying. But it's a double-edged sword. What Oscar did in 1961-62 is an anomaly. That's what makes it as great of an accomplishment. Hundreds of players played in that era but only one man accomplished this feat.
Ok, going off the spread sheet link I posted they have some great names on it and Big O is 3rd best IMO in that decade. I would take Wilt and Russell ahead of him but those 2 are easily top 10 so being behind them gives him plenty of room to be in the top 10. A lot of people put a lot of emphasis on hardware though so that has to drop him.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Says Oscar Robertson Better Than Jordan, LeBron | Lakers Nation
that link is a glaring endorsement but I question his bias in the matter, having never played with LBJ and barely with MJ, but I trust his opinion a lot more than MJs, that is for sure.
Yeah those stats are like unicorns...:rollseyes:
Here it is if you care to look:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ame68dstirBmdFR5dFhINUVYZlRfX3lMcDBKZmI2YlE#gid=0
Explanation here:
Statistical reference is useful but difficult to interpret. The game was played at a breakneck pace, and per game stats were very high while shooting percentages were woefully low. To that end I’ve undertaken a brutal (for me) endeavor to modernize the box score stats of the very best players from 1960-69 by factoring pace, effective field goal percentage differential, and rebound rate.
The problem back then was the quantity of shots were much more important than the quality of the shot. That is why there were so many shots and fg percentage for that era was low. Today the pace is slowed down and there is a play basically every possession. So now fg percentage is much higher but pace is MUCH slower. You cant just simply adjust it doesn't work. You really can't compare an era that was so different.
Well done, you found a few people who think that MJ is the GOAT. Give me Kareem every time. 1 on 1, to start a franchise, and as the GOAT. His level of dominance and length of effectiveness is unmatched, and the stats and hardware show it.
Also the very article you posted has a whole thread dedicated to that survey.
Well done, you found a few people who think that MJ is the GOAT. Give me Kareem every time. 1 on 1, to start a franchise, and as the GOAT. His level of dominance and length of effectiveness is unmatched, and the stats and hardware show it.
Also the very article you posted has a whole thread dedicated to that survey.