Clayton
Well-Known Member
You're doing it wrong. You're only supposed to start NFL topics if it makes your team look better than everyone else.
I think Arizona has the best 'duo' by a large margin.
You're doing it wrong. You're only supposed to start NFL topics if it makes your team look better than everyone else.
What about secondary as a whole??You're doing it wrong. You're only supposed to start NFL topics if it makes your team look better than everyone else.
I think Arizona has the best 'duo' by a large margin.
That's a different question to be fair, and I am kind of stealing from NFL.com topics the past couple of days, but some teams on this list I would immediately get rid of with the Bills being the most extreme example.What about secondary as a whole??
Oh i agree, i just think they should rank the secondary as a whole.. Cuz it takes more than two corners to get the job done..That's a different question to be fair, and I am kind of stealing from NFL.com topics the past couple of days, but some teams on this list I would immediately get rid of with the Bills being the most extreme example.
The problem with ranking secondaries as a whole is that there are too many variables. Usually a CB2 or CB3 getting hurt means putting on a street level player who is basically a traffic cone for most teams.Oh i agree, i just think they should rank the secondary as a whole.. Cuz it takes more than two corners to get the job done..
The corner game imo depends on the pass rush, unless your Sherman, Peterson or Revis.. Again imo
But then again, if you have a great pass rush so so players can be pretty good in said secondary..The problem with ranking secondaries as a whole is that there are too many variables. Usually a CB2 or CB3 getting hurt means putting on a street level player who is basically a traffic cone for most teams.
Assuming we can include inside guys- just throwing stuff against the wall
1. Talib/Harris
2. Peterson/Mathieu
3. Darby/Gilmore
4. Norman/Breeland
5. Butler/Ryan
6. Sherman/Anyone
7. Smith/Amerson
8. Varret/Hayward
9. Slay/Diggs
10. Trufant/Alford
Assuming we can include inside guys- just throwing stuff against the wall
1. Talib/Harris
2. Peterson/Mathieu
3. Darby/Gilmore
4. Norman/Breeland
5. Butler/Ryan
6. Sherman/Anyone
7. Smith/Amerson
8. Varret/Hayward
9. Slay/Diggs
10. Trufant/Alford
I think for now Jeremy Lane (the guy who intercepted Brady in SB49 and then broke his arm on the return) will remain underrated if not anonymous. He's always played really well when healthy though, and this season could be where he gets his introduction. Even still, Sherman + random guy would be better to have than most of the duos that people are putting up on their top 10. It's like when you're playing ff and try to trade off 2 "good" players for one elite starter and a backup....you junk the backup after the deal anyway.Figured Seattle's duo would be there somewhere.
Assuming we can include inside guys- just throwing stuff against the wall
1. Talib/Harris
2. Peterson/Mathieu
3. Darby/Gilmore
4. Norman/Breeland
5. Butler/Ryan
6. Sherman/Anyone
7. Smith/Amerson
8. Varret/Hayward
9. Slay/Diggs
10. Trufant/Alford
Been thinking about this...I would go
1) Talib/Harris
2) Peterson/Mathieu
3) Darby/Gilmore
4) Sherman/Lane
5) Verrett/Flowers--I question putting this one here as health has not been good for them
6) Butler/Ryan
7) Norman/Breeland
8) Trufant/Alford
9) Slay/Diggs
10) Kirkpatrick/Jones
Dude, you clearly forgot the dynamic duo of Brandon Carr and Orlando Scandrick....
Oh man I apologize. Not sure how in the world I could miss such a duo.