bksballer89
Most Popular Member
Classic message board power trip lmao
Are you really comparing me starting a thread with a legit question to what Wiggy was doing? Really?
Asking others opinion on which of 3 players drafted in the last 2 years is most likely to be a superstar is petty? Lol wow
Classic message board power trip lmao
Are you really comparing me starting a thread with a legit question to what Wiggy was doing? Really?
Talk about petty.
Your poll was petty bullshit. You denying that?
Why is it petty?
Because you and I both know most would side with me?
We had a debate going. If you think your side has merit, then it is a legit question.
Lol, sure thing
So you are saying it isn't a legit question?
You overvalue your Laker players. Which is fine. Ingram and Ball are both very good prospects. Tatum is a better one, IMO. I think most would agree, although Ingram played very well tonight.
Yet again you neglect Kuzma.
Probably because he's a Lakers players, and because I'm a Lakers fan and you want to disagree with everything I say, he must be a scrub.
So that is the issue?
I am not neglecting Kuzma. He is a good player. He also has nowhere near the upside of the other 2.
Since all your guys are so good, I see no reason for you to even sign a FA this summer.
My issue with shaqdaddy is that she is one of the most biased posters here.
And I never said Ball and Ingram won't be superstars. I said it is unlikely. Truthfully, it is unlikely for any rookie not named Simmons and maybe Tatum.
Depends on what one means by "superstar", I suppose... I don't see it, either, frankly.not trying to start any crap, man. but don't you think it's a tad early to make that determination...?
Depends on what one means by "superstar", I suppose... I don't see it, either, frankly.
- Ingram comes closest to that potential, IMO. Dude is somewhat held back by his genetics... he just doesn't seem to have the frame to hold weight/muscle. But he can possibly become KD like in his game.
- Kuzma doesn't scream "star" to me... rather, I see a rich man's role player... which I honestly don't mean as a put down. That's still amazing value for where he was picked.
- Ball is interesting. He simply has to fix that monstrousity of a shot... get that mess broken down totally and then built back up. If he can do that, I'd be more bullish on him. He's gotta show he can do that. Or else it's always gonna hold him back.
I hear ya...not really saying "superstar" either. in fact, i'm placing ANY tag on any rookie or 2nd year player until i see more...
that was my only point...
All of the Lakers players need to be viewed through the prisms of 1.) they play the game at a high pace (LAL lead the league in FGAs per game), 2.) they are a bad team overall, and 3.) many are young.
Tough to talk in certainty given these factors... but I will say it's a situation built for some inflated offensive stats.