- Thread starter
- #61
he doesnt care , he hates KC and his hate blinds himThe defense failed at several important times in the game. You always judge a game by the last play, that is not the whole story.
he doesnt care , he hates KC and his hate blinds himThe defense failed at several important times in the game. You always judge a game by the last play, that is not the whole story.
The defense failed at several important times in the game. You always judge a game by the last play, that is not the whole story.
and i expect our defense to hold a 15 point lead late . the whole thing is KC has to be perfect to win because the rest of the team cant hold up its end of the deal
he doesn't have to be perfect we got hosed on the bad call and we couldn't covert on a 3rd and 1.
The defense failed at several important times in the game. You always judge a game by the last play, that is not the whole story.
again for us to win KC has to be perfect or else we wouldnt have debates game in and game out win or lose about the qb
the defense failed massively vs the saints
That was $6M down the drain. At least it wasn't my money.pryor season is over to the IR
OK. How much better does he have to be to overcome our defense?KC doesn't have to be perfect. That's a fallacy.
OK. How much better does he have to be to overcome our defense?
Really? Giving up over 25 points per game and over 30 the last 2 games and an offense doesn't have to overcome that? I gotta disagree. Our defense does need to be over come. Our offense needs to score over 30 points to give us any chance to win. That is asking a lot of any offense or QB.Who's to say our defense could be overcome? That doesn't change the fact that Kirk has left some plays on the field and/or fucked up.
Who's to say our defense could be overcome? That doesn't change the fact that Kirk has left some plays on the field and/or fucked up.
The main problem with suppositions is that it goes both ways. Some say it was the defense, some say that it was failure at critical times by the offense. I've read that there are those who say that 31 points in a game should win. All of those things are true in a place where only one team dictates terms. It just happens that none of it applies to the NFL.
How easy is it to say that it was the fault of the defense when any defense can easily retort that had the offense done its job the defense would spend less time on the field?
How easy is it to say that it was the fault of the offense when any offense can easily retort that better defense and they get more opportunity to do a better job?
31 points in a game should be enough to win except in those instances where the other team has intent to score 32.
Let's be honest about what's being argued about.....the official record doesn't show offense 4, defense 6 or the same in reverse. What it shows is Washington 4-6 thus far on the season, and that ......includes everybody.