- Thread starter
- #1
I don't see this as being the fact. No way Vince lets his next Cena get stamped with a wellness policy violation for something that I or you can buy at a vitamin supplement store. Reigns didn't get popped for taking Muscle Pharm products.Word is he took some legal supplements that weren't on the approved list(not everything legal and store bought is allowed) but it wasn't steroids or HGH or anything like that.
Also it's not a storyline, WWE would never make a joke of their wellness policy because they would be in so much shit.
I don't see this as being the fact. No way Vince lets his next Cena get stamped with a wellness policy violation for something that I or you can buy at a vitamin supplement store. Reigns didn't get popped for taking Muscle Pharm products.
I just don't see that happening.
Why? It still happens in other sports too. And everyone says how stupid can that person be BUT it still happens every now and then.I have a hard time believing that someone in Reigns position wouldn't get his legal supplements cleared by the WWE before using them
Taking a legal supplement that is on a sport's banned list isn't innocence in my book. To me they are just as guilty as someone who took something that is illegal. Those banned supplements are on the list for a reason!Athletes blame failed tests on legal supplements. There are exceptions like the Star Cap case but its usually not proven that's what happened. I'll give almost anyone the benefit of the doubt until they flunk a test. Then you have to prove your innocence
I've heard that too. I guess they could leave him in the match and have him be the one that loses the match. If he wins, the fans could riot.They knew about this before MITB! Meaning, they knew about this before they announced the Triple Threat Match. Reigns serves 30 days. Returns just in time for the Triple Threat.
May also explain why they were willing to let him lose cleanly to Seth Rollins.
I've heard that too. I guess they could leave him in the match and have him be the one that loses the match. If he wins, the fans could riot.
Fair enough. I think there's a huge difference in my book. One is an oversight and the other is cheating. WWE isn't competition in the traditional sense but breaking PED rules clearly gives someone an advantage in their careerTaking a legal supplement that is on a sport's banned list isn't innocence in my book. To me they are just as guilty as someone who took something that is illegal. Those banned supplements are on the list for a reason!
Tainted GNC supplements or forgetting to take a piss test are both highly unlikely