F=ma
This means the more mass an object has, the more force you need to accelerate it.
Got that right out of the definition of F=ma. So he should be able to accelerate quicker.
F=ma
F=ma
He has less mass now.
He never had vision or instincts.
But he ran hard.
Nice try though Bill Nye. Force, strength, power, supplied by muscle, which I highly doubt he tried to shed. The muscle is still there to supply the same drive, to less weight, which should equal more power.This means the more mass an object has, the more force you need to accelerate it.
Got that right out of the definition of F=ma. So he should be able to accelerate quicker.
I was just pointing out there's a relationship. Mostly I'm not sure if he's the type of back that will benefit. His thickness, even if it was of the fatter type, was useful for his style.This means the more mass an object has, the more force you need to accelerate it.
Got that right out of the definition of F=ma. So he should be able to accelerate quicker.
I'm squarely in that demographic, for sure.anyone who thinks Penny will be given every chance to 'win the job' over Carson, has to in their right mind, also believe that Perine will be afforded every opportunity to handle the load over Kelley
regardless of the weight of the draft stock, there is more invested in Penny/Perine than there is Carson/Kelley, and until the talent/production proves otherwise, the P's will be giving their chance over the rest
IDK, even if Carson and Perine are the starting RB on their team, most everyone expect Carson to be more valuable, with good reason I might add. I have Carson on the same level as Crowell and Collins if he starts and at this point he is the starter. Perine is in a 50/50 deal with a similar RB, I like Perine over fat Kelly, but Kelly will most likely split carries with Perine and Thompson will be the most valuable RB on the Redskins.anyone who thinks Penny will be given every chance to 'win the job' over Carson, has to in their right mind, also believe that Perine will be afforded every opportunity to handle the load over Kelley
regardless of the weight of the draft stock, there is more invested in Penny/Perine than there is Carson/Kelley, and until the talent/production proves otherwise, the P's will be giving their chance over the rest
IDK, even if Carson and Perine are the starting RB on their team, most everyone expect Carson to be more valuable, with good reason I might add. I have Carson on the same level as Crowell and Collins if he starts and at this point he is the starter. Perine is in a 50/50 deal with a similar RB, I like Perine over fat Kelly, but Kelly will most likely split carries with Perine and Thompson will be the most valuable RB on the Redskins.
Well it’s all relative. Compared to the Redskins , Carson is a ace RB versus Perine. That is just facts.I'm doubting anyone gets bellcow treatment outside of penny on Seattle this yr
Could be kellleyEveryone here seems to be saying Perine.
Rob Kelley got the start with the first teamers tonight.
Perine came in later, got hurt. Kabri Bibbs came in and looked okish. Thompson is an injury mystery
The lesson here? Don't bother drafting a Redskins RB. You're better off just waiting until after Week 1 and using a waiver if some guy looks good.
This is excellent reasoning.anyone who thinks Penny will be given every chance to 'win the job' over Carson, has to in their right mind, also believe that Perine will be afforded every opportunity to handle the load over Kelley
regardless of the weight of the draft stock, there is more invested in Penny/Perine than there is Carson/Kelley, and until the talent/production proves otherwise, the P's will be giving their chance over the rest
This is excellent reasoning.
However, production always wins out.
And with rookie salaries, their investment is relatively minimal/common.
Maybe this is a poor comparison but Jeremy Langford (high 4th round pick) was supposed to be the starter but Jordan Howard (5th round pick) was simply better and took over as the starter by season's end.
Just can't see a coaching staff deliberately trotting out the less impressive back just because of draft stock.
If anything, a higher pick will may simply stick around longer because of where he was drafted. But that's no lock for touches.
This might be an ideal season to track this with the RB situations in CLE, SEA, DET, and WSH.agree completely - talent and ultimately on-the-field-production will always win out in the end
and even in that season where Howard was clearly better than Langford, it still took an injury to Langford before he lost his job. I think it was like week 3 of that season, but the Bears were still trotting Langford out there ahead of Howard to start the season.
This is excellent reasoning.
However, production always wins out.
And with rookie salaries, their investment is relatively minimal/common.
Maybe this is a poor comparison but Jeremy Langford (high 4th round pick) was supposed to be the starter but Jordan Howard (5th round pick) was simply better and took over as the starter by season's end.
Just can't see a coaching staff deliberately trotting out the less impressive back just because of draft stock.
If anything, a higher pick will may simply stick around longer because of where he was drafted. But that's no lock for touches.
Also, if the Redskins thought Perine was good enough, the would not have drafted Guice. This isn't nearly the same as the Penny/Carson situation.
If the Seahawks thought Carson was good enough, they wouldn't have drafted penny
Just penny more of a lock to get a crack since he was a 1st round pick
Reason enough to draft a RB, or 2 or 3, in RDS 2-7..not reason enough to draft one in the first, especially with glaring holes along the line and throughout the D.Seahawks RBs Corp was a mash unit, that included Carson. Reason enough to draft another good RB.
If the Seahawks thought Carson was good enough, they wouldn't have drafted penny
Just penny more of a lock to get a crack since he was a 1st round pick