Not having Bama on the list is pure stupidity. Even if Saban only coaches another 5 years I'd still put the over/under at 2.5 Natty's. And if he hit the over that would probably be better than every other program the country over the next decade.
Ummm is the word “Next” confusing to you? They are obviously stating that Alabama is currently a dynasty, so they are asking about the NEXT dynasty.Not having Bama on the list is pure stupidity. Even if Saban only coaches another 5 years I'd still put the over/under at 2.5 Natty's. And if he hit the over that would probably be better than every other program the country over the next decade.
Ummm is the word “Next” confusing to you? They are obviously stating that Alabama is currently a dynasty, so they are asking about the NEXT dynasty.
If they win two in the next five years, it would be considered part of the current dynasty.I was under the assumption that they were talking about from this point forward. They can be the next great dynasty, even after having been one the last decade.
If they win two in the next five years, it would be considered part of the current dynasty.
Only grass fairies wear purple!Only phag teams put stickers on their helmets.
Not having Bama on the list is pure stupidity. Even if Saban only coaches another 5 years I'd still put the over/under at 2.5 Natty's. And if he hit the over that would probably be better than every other program the country over the next decade.
The local aggie vet said a good one the other day. He said, "Hell, if all it takes to get a national championship is spending more money, we should have spent more money a long time ago."Texas A&M is spending like they are already one.
I think UGA could. Some of the best players in the country come from that state plus there's also the other surrounding southern states that produce studs.
To be fair you would kill to have had the last 8 years that Auburn has had.Bama was no doubt aided by the up and down competition from the rest of their conference. Auburn has been kind of up a few times and mostly down, LSU has sputtered at best, Florida has been a shell of themselves, Vols might as well just quit even playing football... etc.
USC had one at a time when the Pac didn't put up a lot of fight, or at least not a consistent one.
Kind of requires help to win that much that often and be winning your conference enough to claim a dynasty doesn't it?
That would be the kind of up part of it. Over this 'dynasty' of Bama's though, they haven't put up a real fight against them for the conference more than 3 times in that 10 season span. Florida gave them a challenge like once or twice, and LSU like once?To be fair you would kill to have had the last 8 years that Auburn has had.
1 National Championship
2 National Title game appearances
2 SEC Titles
3 Western Division Titles
Plus a Sugar Bowl appearance
Also note we lost the second national championship by 1 point in the last 13 seconds (so we weren't blown out).
The local aggie vet said a good one the other day. He said, "Hell, if all it takes to get a national championship is spending more money, we should have spent more money a long time ago."
When Alabama's run is done - or maybe in the midst of that run - the next team up will probably be Georgia, followed by Clemson, Ohio St. and/or Oklahoma.
Others that could sneak in a title, but not likely to go on an extended run during that period, include Penn St., Washington, Wisconsin, Auburn, Michigan St. & USC. And maybe even a G-5 upstart like UCF.