Make Michigan Football Great Again!

[7Samurai13]

You said the best of the last century, I'd rank any national title winning coach above Bo.

Well then, we can agree that Bo is the most overrated head coach ever then.

 

[Bamabino]

Really? Saban played at MSU and coached under one of your legendary coaches?

Saban played at Kent State doofus.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Saban played at Kent State doofus.

, yes I understand that. There was tone with my post to indicate the situations were nothing alike.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

I've been owned? Oh man, you are a trip. Want to be made to look like a royal ass hole? I gotcha sweetheart. I'll be back with goodies just for you.

People who are owned in internet arguments often also tend to make threats against people. You going to threaten to hack me next? Remember, you're the one who created this thread...not me.

 

[fishinabarrel]

I've been owned? Oh man, you are a trip. Want to be made to look like a royal ass hole? I gotcha sweetheart. I'll be back with goodies just for you.

Don't worry. According to many Michigan fans they "own" Ohio State and Michigan State too.
Not so sure of their "owned" definition, but it ain't that bad

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Well then, we can agree that Bo is the most overrated head coach ever then.

Most? No. I think he was a great coach and was awesome in terms of winning the B10 but just couldn't get it done in the bowls.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Don't worry. According to many Michigan fans they "own" Ohio State and Michigan State too.
Not so sure of their "owned" definition, but it ain't that bad

Now you're just putting words in my mouth. Michigan State? Yes. Ohio State? no.

 

[Bamabino]

, yes I understand that. There was tone with my post to indicate the situations were nothing alike.

Ah, tone deaf. That explains why all y'alls fans are so football-challenged then.

 

[theboardref]

TBR

Like that Michigan math, they own MSU yet lost 7 of the past 8.

M&B

That's what happens when you have 50 years of domination. It doesn't get erased in 7 years.

TBR

In the past 24 years, it is 13-11. Looking up games where people wore leather helmets mean jack and shit.

M&B

Yeah, like I said, beyond the last 8 Michigan has dominated. If you remove the last 8, it would be 12-4. And that continues beyond that span.

TBR

Let me explain math to you man. I'll break it down for you like a first grader since clearly that is the level I need to communicate it. So in the past 24 years, there are 13 wins for Michigan and 11 wins for Michigan State. That equals far from domination. If if were a skiff we would be riding a boat. Well if you don't count the last 8 years, derp derp. Well if you could pull a rabbit out of your ass you could be a magician too, but you can't wave a magic wand and make that shit happen either. Not sure if it is pure delusion or arrogance but your argument is laughable. If the 8 years didn't happen then (insert stupid argument).

TBR

By Michigan logic take way their title in 1997 and they are as relevant a program as: Maryland (1953), Syracuse (1959), Minnesota (1960), Pittsburgh (1976), BYU (1984), and Colorado/Georgia Tech (1990). Not to mention in 1997 it was a split title. The last title beside that was in 1948.

M&B

Except the argument was always PRE the last 8 years, or did that skip over your head? When I referenced "50 years of domination not erased by 7" I meant the 50 years prior to the last 7, idiot. Michigan was 32-17-1 in the previous 50 years, IE domination. So, as I said, that doesn't get erased in a 7 or 8 year span. Your idiocy is laughable.

M&B

God you're stupid. I'm not making losses disappear. As I stated originally, but your failure to read overlooked, Michigan dominated the series for 50 years. That isn't erased by 7 wins. Pointing out an arbitrary 24 year span is irrelevant to that point. Yes, the smaller you make the timeline between this current MSU streak and Michigan's 50 year streak, it makes it look less bad. If you go back to 2003, MSU leads 7-6. Yes, they've won 7 of 8, but only because you're referencing a smaller span. The more games you include, the worse it will look for MSU. (my point) was that Michigan had 4 decades of domination prior to that.

M&B

Fucking stupid. You're the one that used an arbitrary 24 year stretch, in which Michigan was ahead multiple games, to conclude that Michigan' wasn't dominating the series. Like I said, beyond the last 8 years, Michigan has dominated this series for it's existence. 8 years doesn't eliminate that. And that's not in the leather helmet days, that's in the modern era of football.

70-79: M 9 MSU 1
80-89: M 8 MSU 2
90-99: M 6 MSU 4
00-09: M 7 MSU 3
10-16: M 1 MSU 5

That's domination, you're an idiot.

TBR

It apparently is "cherry picking" stats by looking at the past 24 years, and saying MSU and Michigan are the same. Despite MSU only having 2 fewer losses AND this being the most recent data. BUT it is not cherry picking or manipulating information by saying "take away the last 8 years and MSU's 7 wins and we dominate".

TLDR version: Looking at 24 years worth of data and coming to a conclusion, not just ANY 24 years but the MOST RECENT 24 years is "CHERRY PICKING DATA". BUT by going back to when teams worse leather helmets is more useful information in knowing who has been the more dominant team for the upcoming season. Taking away wins also shows that despite MSU winning 7 of the last 8 we can wave our magic wand and POOF it is gone and doesn't matter. That is irrelevant information, and Michigan rules the world because of... reasons.

 

[theboardref]

People who are owned in internet arguments often also tend to make threats against people. You going to threaten to hack me next? Remember, you're the one who created this thread...not me.

No need to threaten an intellectual inferior.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

TBR
M&B
TBR
M&B
TBR
TBR
M&B
M&B
M&B

TBR


TLDR version: Looking at 24 years worth of data and coming to a conclusion, not just ANY 24 years but the MOST RECENT 24 years is "CHERRY PICKING DATA". BUT by going back to when teams worse leather helmets is more useful information in knowing who has been the more dominant team for the upcoming season. Taking away wins also shows that despite MSU winning 7 of the last 8 we can wave our magic wand and POOF it is gone and doesn't matter. That is irrelevant information, and Michigan rules the world because of... reasons.

Like I said, you got owned and still don't understand the argument. So you created a threat to try and somehow mitigate that ownage and are still owned. That's why you felt it necessary to copy many posts all proving that you got owned and still don't understand the comments.

My statement remains true, That's what happens when you have 50 years of domination. It doesn't get erased in 7 years.

 

[Across The Field]

Most? No. I think he was a great coach and was awesome in terms of winning the B10 but just couldn't get it done in the bowls.

Neither could Lloyd. He was 6-7 in bowl games all-time. There's a reason nobody ever puts him ahead of Bo in terms of best coaches in michigan's history.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

Neither could Lloyd. He was 6-7 in bowl games all-time. There's a reason nobody ever puts him ahead of Bo in terms of best coaches in michigan's history.

But he won the one that was most important.

 

[7Samurai13]

Most? No. I think he was a great coach and was awesome in terms of winning the B10 but just couldn't get it done in the bowls.

I bet you believe that Brad Johnson was a better quarterback than Dan Marino since he won the super bowl.

Was Craig Krenzel a better QB than Jimmy Hardbawlz because Krenzel won a natty and Jimmy couldn't?

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

I bet you believe that Brad Johnson was a better quarterback than Dan Marino since he won the super bowl.

Was Craig Krenzel a better QB than Jimmy Hardbawlz because Krenzel won a natty and Jimmy couldn't?

My opinion of Dan Marino is limited to this:

 

[7Samurai13]

My opinion of Dan Marino is limited to this:

Alright, Einhorn

 

[Across The Field]

But he won the one that was most important.

The Rose Bowl? So did Bo. He won two of them.

 

[MAIZEandBLUE09]

The Rose Bowl? So did Bo. He won two of them.

But not when it really mattered. Bo had a shot at winning a national title on at least one occasion had he won the bowl game.

 

[theboardref]

He's in for making Michigan great again, are you?

 

[7Samurai13]

The Rose Bowl? So did Bo. He won two of them.

Well I believe that was the last Rose Bowl win for Michigan.