Kaepernick might be a better choice to start at quarterback than Blaine Gabbert. Suprisingly, Kaepernick has thrown many more touchdowns than interceptions. Unfortunately, I'll explain why Kaepernick is a terrible quarterback, even though his career total of thrown touchdown passes are much higher than his total of interceptions Kaepernick has thrown. In 2013, Kaepernick benefited from the services of--at the time--the best offensive line in football: Staley, Iupati, that pro bowl center, Boone and Davis. Gore was one of the top three running backs in the NFL. Blocking from the offensive line was extremely effective, and versital. San Francisco ran the ball so well, when San Francisco passed the ball the receives were wide open--opposing defenses had to devote much attention to San Francisco's running game, and coverages of receivers were looser because of the home run threat of San Francisco's running game. Also, until the Super Bowl against the Ravens, no team was able to contain Kaepernick as a legitimate running threat--Kaepernick was a home run threat when he ran the ball from the quarterback position; as long as Kaepernick ran the ball from the edge.
Popular vote doesn't matter, and as terrible as Trump is, he's not even going to come close to the Reagan shellacking of Mondale in 1984. Reagan took 49 of the 50 states, with Mondale barely winning his home state of Minnesota by less than a quarter of a percentage point. Reagan took 525 out of 538 possible electoral votes. It was a beating we're likely to never see again.
I don't know if that's true. Right now Trump is polling in the low to mid 40%, and I imagine there are people who won't say they're voting for him, but in the privacy of the polling booth they'll pull the lever for Trump anyway.
Found your problem.
Again, there's your problem. You think John Oliver is informed. Let me clue you in on a little secret: John Oliver is no more informed than any other talking head you see on tv, and just like the rest, he too has an agenda he's pushing.
