- Thread starter
- #181
Yep, under rated rival game.That's a better win for the Hawks than most college football fans understand.
Nope I got it -3 with no juicew
wasnt it -3.5?
-3.5 at kickoff.....so hope you got your money in earlyI think it was just -3. It was -2.5 all week.
As a team, it might be disappointing, but I think it was a good W for Stanley. This was his first game where he had to deal with a "clutch" situation. Wasn't great, but he turn the ball over or anything like that.
Pretty high bar if 330/5 TDs/0 INTs isn't good enough lolAs a team, it might be disappointing, but I think it was a good W for Stanley. This was his first game where he had to deal with a "clutch" situation. Wasn't great, but he turn the ball over or anything like that.
They're definitely better than Tech, Baylor and Kansas and I think they can compete well with KSU, TCU, Texas and WVU. Just beat who they should and sneak out 1 or 2 more and they should win 6 or 7 gamesI'm pretty impressed with what ISU showed today. They could make some noise in the B12.
The Campbell hire was a great move for them imo. His style fits well in the Big12I'm pretty impressed with what ISU showed today. They could make some noise in the B12.
2 things
ISU was much better than I expected. The offense is going to make people go crazy this year.
Do our WR have something against laying out and diving to catch a ball?
There were at least 3 different passes where the intended target could have dove to catch it but didn't.