- Thread starter
- #1
Ahh, hit the wrong button but already fixed it. ... a capital T back at ya. ....
lolAhh, hit the wrong button but already fixed it. ... a capital T back at ya. ....
baldwin balling past 2 yearsTough one. Baldwin is eh. Wilson has the higher upside but Seattle is prone to terrible offensive performances, and they have an unproven run game to go along with their aging D.
So I go w B. Cam ain't pretty but he has bigger potential in the long run.
Landry and Baldwin are a wash tho Landry has the upside factor.
Not seeing an upside factor to Landry..he is exactly what he's shown to be. A very good slot style WR..nothing more, no matter where he's at, or who's throwing the ball, that not upside, that's bumping the ceiling with nowhere to go but sideways or down. Get a real passing system around Baldwin, dude might just joint the elite classTough one. Baldwin is eh. Wilson has the higher upside but Seattle is prone to terrible offensive performances, and they have an unproven run game to go along with their aging D.
So I go w B. Cam ain't pretty but he has bigger potential in the long run. Better team imo.
Landry and Baldwin are a wash tho Landry has the upside factor.