Darth Dawkins
kffl trev
Good thing we went for two on that TD. Now we have to go for two.
choke job by Atlanta
No surprise there
That should be the city motto
We won despite our defense. Brady was 28-48 for 505 YDS and 3 TD's. The Pats had 613 total yards. I don't remember much defense during this Super Bowl on either side.Schwartz won them a Super Bowl and he has gotten them to the playoffs.
They just need to play like they care.
I would like to think that they just need to play with intensity - but we'll see.We won despite our defense. Brady was 28-48 for 505 YDS and 3 TD's. The Pats had 613 total yards. I don't remember much defense during this Super Bowl on either side.
That year our offense was dominate in the 1st quarter. His defense got the benefit of playing when we had big leads. The D-line could tee off because we knew they had to pass. If we could get back to putting up 21 points in the 1st quarter his defense might be ok.
My last straw was the loss to the Dolphins last year. Sure we got to the playoffs by beating the lowly NFC East teams. I would have to say Dallas self destructing got us in the playoffs not Schartz's defense. We did beat teams we were supposed to be beat so I have no problem with that.
I can look at the game last year against the Packers and say he has beaten some good teams. Unfortunately, he has more poor performances than good ones. If he were a player we would be screaming for the back up to go in. His defense has been figured out by the NFL an it appears he is unable to adjust to keep it fresh.
I hope we can beat the Bengals with a Rookie QB. They are 0-2 as well so if we lose this game we will be making a strong bid for the number 1 pick in the draft. I don't think this is the gong to happen because we are a good team.
If Schwartz can slow down the 49ers, Steelers, and Ravens then I guess I am wrong. You have more faith than I do in our defense and I hope that you are right.
I do not disagree. This would be a great start!I would like to think that they just need to play with intensity - but we'll see.