- Thread starter
- #1
He shouldn't be ..... not with his daddy's buyout clause.Is he afraid?
I think Ferentz is the one who's unhappy ... at least according to the article. I see his point about offering so many scholly's but a lot of coaches are doing that these days.Really? He's butthurt over a class currently ranked 56th and has just as many commits as Iowa?
Yeah. Thats who I was saying. They offer earlier and earlier every year. Just have to keep up if you want to stay with the pack.I think Ferentz is the one who's unhappy ... at least according to the article. I see his point about offering so many scholly's but a lot of coaches are doing that these days.
Early signings may change that to some extent.Yeah. Thats who I was saying. They offer earlier and earlier every year. Just have to keep up if you want to stay with the pack.
He managed to piss of the three closest P5 schools located near the University of Iowa. lulzYeah, it's pretty apparent how he got his job.
I like this kind of stuff for making rivalries.
No idea if what he says about Fleck and Campbell are true, but what he says about that team from west of Omaha is mostly true.
Not to mention, Iowa destroyed Iowa State and Nebraska, and barely beat Minnesota for Floyd of Rosedale in 2016.
If the three teams are upset then maybe they should do something about it. Mike Riley coached team west of Omaha has not beat Iowa yet.
Give Kirk Ferentz a 20 year extension?I think Iowa just needs to sit back and ask:
"What would Hayden Fry do"/???
Hahahahahahahahahhah. You're funny.I can't remember the last time iowa lost to any of those schools. Gotta be 3 years or so at least. Ferentz should be worried about relevant teams like North Dakota St