- Thread starter
- #1
It worries me a little, but I think the Seahawks are good enough to over come that disadvantage.
It doesn't worry me to the point that I think those games are automatic losses (though it has been an issue in recent history), but it does bother me from the standpoint that it is a built-in competitive disadvantage for the Seahawks and any other west coast team that has to put up with a bunch of 10 am starts and the NFL doesn't seem too interested in rectifying the situation anytime soon.
It really is bullshit. That "can't play more than 2 games on the west coast a season" rule they made. Just another reason to tilt the scales for an east coast bias.
Hell , even my Texans benefitted from this. They were supposed to play in Seattle this year, but since they're already playing in San Diego and San Fransisco, the Seahawks became the odd man out and won't go there for another 4 years.
How they came to choose which west coast team to do this for I do not know.