CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS

[averagejoe]

I know @Bandit does all the stats. I'm a little foggy on the relegation rules but how come sometimes 4 move down to BATG? That seems to be a pretty stiff penalty to me and could use some tweaking. No?

 

[Bandit]

I know @Bandit does all the stats. I'm a little foggy on the relegation rules but how come sometimes 4 move down to BATG? That seems to be a pretty stiff penalty to me and could use some tweaking. No?

It's only if the B league outscores the A league by at least 168 points for the season which is only one point per team per week (12 x 14). Honestly though, two years ago the only reason Trudem and I got sent to B was because of this rule but it still seems fair to me. If you get outscored by the "lesser" league by that many points they deserve to have four teams move up to the big leagues in my opinion.

 

[leftypower]

I know @Bandit does all the stats. I'm a little foggy on the relegation rules but how come sometimes 4 move down to BATG? That seems to be a pretty stiff penalty to me and could use some tweaking. No?

It's only if the B league outscores the A league by at least 168 points for the season which is only one point per team per week (12 x 14). Honestly though, two years ago the only reason Trudem and I got sent to B was because of this rule but it still seems fair to me. If you get outscored by the "lesser" league by that many points they deserve to have four teams move up to the big leagues in my opinion.

Agree with Bandit - and Joe the question should have been 'how come 4 teams move up'. .... Answer: cause they were superior that year.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Agree with Bandit - and Joe the question should have been 'how come 4 teams move up'. .... Answer: cause they were superior that year.

Need to redeem myself for last years collapse ( unbelievable shit fest) and do my part to sent 4 to KOF league

 

[SteelersPride]

I am good with Bandit's proposal.

On Treff's proposal I could care either way.

I vote no on Chef's proposal. Seeing how I don't drink anymore. No nobody knows how hard it is to be a fish that doesn't drink.

i dont drink either

 

[Chef99]

but how come sometimes 4 move down to BATG?

'cuz everyone wants to be where The Action Is!

 

[eaglesnut]

Remove the rolling waivers and replace with weekly reset by standings, worst to first.

What the fuck is this commie shit?

 

[TREFF]

What the fuck is this commie shit?

And that's one of the many reasons why I'm proud to say eaglesnut will always have an automatic no vote from me

 

[eaglesnut]

And that's one of the many reasons why I'm proud to say eaglesnut will always have an automatic no vote from me

Why do you need charity to get out of last place?

 

[Barilko]

well i do prefer rolling however i certainly vote to put it to a vote again...no problem there

i suggest a vote that allows

A stay Rolling

B yes let re vote

if B passes then lay out the options

an extra vote hey its only July

 

[TREFF]

well i do prefer rolling however i certainly vote to put it to a vote again...no problem there

i suggest a vote that allows

A stay Rolling

B yes let re vote

if B passes then lay out the options

an extra vote hey its only July

MORE POLLS!!!

 

[tlance]

Remove the rolling waivers and replace with weekly reset by standings, worst to first..


But, I know that won't get support, so ta hell with it, as Harry Doyle would say.

I got nothing

Weekly reset is the worst rule ever.

Zero strategy in that. It is a rule for beginner leagues. We are not that.

 

[TREFF]

Weekly reset is the worst rule ever.

Zero strategy in that. It is a rule for beginner leagues. We are not that.

as you've stated, and we've debated before, yet I still disagree

 

[eaglesnut]

Weekly reset is the worst rule ever.

Zero strategy in that. It is a rule for beginner leagues. We are not that.

Perhaps you are

 

[leftypower]

Eaglesnut is yet another smart-ass to make my ignore list. .....

 

[tlance]

Perhaps you are

Perhaps not

 

[TREFF]

and honestly, we kinda are.. Our rules have always been as simplistic as possible. So that the best owner in identifying the best players wins, not the player who manipulates scoring or the rules the best..we are not beginners, but the the league was setup to not have rules create the strategy of the league, always has been

 

[TREFF]

Eaglesnut is yet another smart-ass to make my ignore list. .....

hes been on my list for the past 4 months..every now and again I'll hit the button, but not gonna today

 

[eaglesnut]

Perhaps not

I hear ya, just some "beginner types" with beginner type rules.

My shittiest league uses it too.

 

[tlance]

as you've stated, and we've debated before, yet I still disagree

I know your position, but for the life of me can’t understand it.

Any rule that favors certain teams over the rest is a bad rule. Everyone should have the same opportunity on waivers, whether it be the way we have it or FAAB.

Don’t punish the teams that draft well and have early success.

Also, resetting waivers means there is zero strategy as far as when to use your top claim. The way we have it now you really have to think.

Is it worth using the top spot on the next RB that might only have the job 2 or 3 weeks, or should I wait?

With resting waivers it isn’t even a thought. You use the waiver every time.

I can’t even begin to explain how much I hate that.