Southieinnc
Do Your Job!
Browner was well-liked in NE. His not being offered a contract means what he brought was not as valued as what he cost. We signed him before the rules change. My point remains, if you are undecided what to think about a receiver's one good day, think about both guys that covered him in that one good game being cut......Players are cut or not re-signed for a volume of reasons. It doesn't always indicate just one particular vice or weakness. Sometimes it's salary, sometimes it's characters, sometimes it's age, sometimes it's talent, etc.
Browner was overall good in Seattle and helped get the LOB to be a thing that now pretty much every NFL fan can identify, but he had two big problems: PED bust and penalties. So him not returning after the SB48 season didn't tell us the same thing that Walter Thurmond not returning told us.