- Thread starter
- #1
EvanGWatkins
757 Hokie
Rinstated....
no surprise here...
no surprise here...
It will be a fun battle to see between him and Brooks Abbott...Good. A distraction for sure, but hopefully he'll straighten up and fly right.
It will be a fun battle to see between him and Brooks Abbott...
Beamer really showed him.
Beamer really showed him.
He suspended him for the bowl game and then le the law take it's course. The guy was cleared of the charge, so what is the problem.
I would suspend him for being a kicker with arm tattoos.
For some reason my recollection of him is as a terrible kicker. I guess 14/17 and 43/44 isn't terrible, but I still remember hating him so much...
Journell spent Dec 22 to Dec 29 in jail. Beamer had no choice but to suspend him from the Sugar Bowl. If VT would have let him pay there would have been some serious backlash over it.
Also, Journell was not cleared of the charge, he pleaded guilty to misdemeanor traspassing.
I have no problem with Journell being reinstated to the team, but come on Beamer, at least suspend him from 1-2 games to start the season.
He missed the Sugar Bowl, was suspended from the team for six months, and met his penalty.
Are you really going to pretend that Mike London would have given him more punishment? If Mike London needed a kicker, he'd be back the next game.
:bored:
Well considering that when 3 UVa players got into a fight at JMU, the 2(Wallace and Price) that were actually charged with something were dismissed from the football team, and the other (Walcott's) charges were dismissed. So, yes, London would have given out a stiffer penalty.
what were they charged with? was it more serious than trespassing?
What did those guys who stole from the gay bar get?
Other than dude love?