Alabama has played UT-Chattanooga 3 times since 2008

[Deep Creek]

I agree. Clearly the Pac-12 and B1G had no business being in there. I vote for two ACC and two SEC.

Who would have been the 2nd SEC team last year? Auburn? Zero U took them to the woodshed.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

While I'm the first to admit some G5s/FCS teams are as good as some P5 bottom dwellers (if not better), they shouldn't be....especially considering the disparity in resources. Hell, I think there are some G5s that play 2-3 P5s every year in OOC.

Boise St. and Colorado St. come to mind in regards to G5 teams playing more than one P5 team per season. Cincy is a team that comes to mind as a G5 team that should be in a P5 conference. They seem to do solid year in and year out in not just football but BB also.

 

[Rolltide94]

Washington plays at Atlanta vs Auburn next season and then vs BYU the following week. Then the season after they start their home & away series with Michigan and BYU again. After that they have a home & away vs Ohio St. As far as PAC teams go ... I'd be hard pressed to find a division worse than the SEC East. As far as the SEC West goes there's Bama, LSU and Auburn is up and down. Ole Miss is going down the shitter once the NCAA buttfvks them for good reason. Arky hasn't done shit and neither has Miss. St. and Texas A&M.

Good for you, glad to see y'all recognize you had to do something to improve the quality of your schedule based on your dismal conference.

LOL, Texas A&M has 2 Pac-12 wins in the last 2 years. with 2 games played.

Half your league has 8 wins or less in 18 games over that span, and Oregon St and Arizona have 3 and 4....

Yet, A&M is the one that hasn't done shit, LOL. Care to give A&M 16 more chances and see where they finish, considering they haven't played Oregon St or Arizona twice yet, I think it is safe to say it's better than top half of the PAC. Yet they finished 4 and 5th in the SEC West, those years.

Florida, Tennessee and Georgia would all be contenders in the PAC. Shit, if Florida had a QB, they would be contenders in the SEC.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Good for you, glad to see y'all recognize you had to do something to improve the quality of your schedule based on your dismal conference.

LOL, Texas A&M has 2 Pac-12 wins in the last 2 years. with 2 games played.

Half your league has 8 wins or less in 18 games over that span, and Oregon St and Arizona have 3 and 4....

Yet, A&M is the one that hasn't done shit, LOL. Care to give A&M 16 more chances and see where they finish, considering they haven't played Oregon St or Arizona twice yet, I think it is safe to say it's better than top half of the PAC. Yet they finished 4 and 5th in the SEC West, those years.

Florida, Tennessee and Georgia would all be contenders in the PAC. Shit, if Florida had a QB, they would be contenders in the SEC.

All I see is; blah blah blah .. the SEC lacks the testicles to play their own conference members because they have a big fat yellow streak running down the middle of their back.

 

[Rolltide94]

All I see is; blah blah blah .. the SEC lacks the testicles to play their own conference members because they have a big fat yellow streak running down the middle of their back.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

One of the few breeds of dogs that will take on a wolf and have a fighting chance of holding its own.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Husky - Malamutes are so fvkng tough they hang out with Polar Bears.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Husky - Malamutes are so fvkng tough they hang out with Polar Bears.

btw .. these motherfvkers wouldn't back down from playing their own conference members.

 

[4down20]

btw .. these motherfvkers wouldn't back down from playing their own conference members.

Of course not, you guys don't get smacked around until you play out of conference.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Of course not, you guys don't get smacked around until you play out of conference.

Only six college football teams have played more P5 opponents than Washington.

 

[4down20]

Only six college football teams have played more P5 opponents than Washington.

Not even sure where you come up with such a stat. From what years are you cherry picking?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Not even sure where you come up with such a stat. From what years are you cherry picking?

LOL ... are you doubting me 'again'? I'm going by BCS conference teams (when they were in the BCS) and P5 teams. No cherry picking involved.

 

[4down20]

LOL ... are you doubting me 'again'? I'm going by BCS conference teams (when they were in the BCS) and P5 teams. No cherry picking involved.

It's a dumb and meaningless stat, so I am merely curious.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

It's a dumb and meaningless stat, so I am merely curious.

No its not dumb and meaningless. It shows who has a set of balls and who hasn't.

 

[4down20]

No its not dumb and meaningless. It shows who has a set of balls and who hasn't.

You have how many National Championships in that time?

Yeah, it means shit.

But hey, good times at Moral Victory U I guess.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

You have how many National Championships in that time?

Yeah, it means shit.

But hey, good times at Moral Victory U I guess.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

No its not dumb and meaningless. It shows who has a set of balls and who hasn't.

I found a chart that depicts the Alabama fans view of a 9 game conference schedule cross referenced with their view point on home and homes.

 

[4down20]

So you are no longer going by BCS era.

 

[Mike30142]

DAMN, 30 pages, TL, DR. I'll say this even if it's been said before.

1. Saban has voted to go to 9 conference games every time it's come up.
2. Even though I would like to see Bama play home and home games OOC, they won't because the money's too good at the neutral sites.
3. Neither I, nor anyone else on this board has the ability to force 9 conference games on the SEC.
4. 52-6
5. 24-6

 

[AlaskaGuy]

So you are no longer going by BCS era.

I went back to 1990.