- Thread starter
- #1
nateistheshi
New Member
I think it's very easy to say that Madbum is at least the 3rd best pitcher on the Giants now (I called him as being better than Dirty last year .) How long, if ever, is it until he surpasses Cain? Cain's an absolute horse, but there's an argument to be made that the transition has already begun.
Cain is averaging 6.60 innings/start, Madbum is averaging 6.05. Keep in mind that this includes the 1/3 inning fluke, take that away and the numbers become much closer; 6.31 for Bumgarner.
Cain has repressed hits and homeruns (both probably involve luck and skill) at a more effective rate. Cain: .38 HR/9 and 7.53 H/9; Madbum: 0.43 HR/9 and 9.24 H/9. That's where the areas Cain is better in end.
Madbum has a better K% at 22.2% vs. 19.7% and he has a better BBK% at 5.5% vs. 6.5%.
On top of that, Madbum has been one of, if not the most unlucky pitcher in baseball. He has a .333 BABIP (easily outside the realm of skill.) and a 69.1 LOB%. This could be due to Madbum not pitching nearly as well from the stretch as he does from the windup, however, at each level where he's thrown at least 14 starts, 76.2 is his lowest LOB%.
As far as Cain vs. Madbum goes, I think Cain is still a bit better, but that won't last for very long.
At some point in time I'll make a post to show historical comps for Madbum due to his age and dominance, but I feel too lazy for now and that's jumping the gun by a bit.
Cain is averaging 6.60 innings/start, Madbum is averaging 6.05. Keep in mind that this includes the 1/3 inning fluke, take that away and the numbers become much closer; 6.31 for Bumgarner.
Cain has repressed hits and homeruns (both probably involve luck and skill) at a more effective rate. Cain: .38 HR/9 and 7.53 H/9; Madbum: 0.43 HR/9 and 9.24 H/9. That's where the areas Cain is better in end.
Madbum has a better K% at 22.2% vs. 19.7% and he has a better BBK% at 5.5% vs. 6.5%.
On top of that, Madbum has been one of, if not the most unlucky pitcher in baseball. He has a .333 BABIP (easily outside the realm of skill.) and a 69.1 LOB%. This could be due to Madbum not pitching nearly as well from the stretch as he does from the windup, however, at each level where he's thrown at least 14 starts, 76.2 is his lowest LOB%.
As far as Cain vs. Madbum goes, I think Cain is still a bit better, but that won't last for very long.
At some point in time I'll make a post to show historical comps for Madbum due to his age and dominance, but I feel too lazy for now and that's jumping the gun by a bit.
Last edited by a moderator: