- Thread starter
- #1
TobyTyler
New Member
Bogus provisional.
He hit a provisional.
Then he decided he wanted to play his first shot, ended up taking a drop abd was hitting his 3rd shot.
That is not cheating.
Tiger Woods has never cheated. And he's a good man. A really good man.
THAT'S why one hit's a "provisional"...in case He can't find the original bal dip shad. Proper play, no penalty except for the "re-drop"
If he wasn't penalized then your comment is utter stupidity. No surprise here, you never post anything of relevance.
Lolz robitic...I remember now...Last nite I spanked your peepee for being stupid on a thread and now your trolling me...how cute of you. What a cum dumpster you are...
Lolz robitic...I remember now...Last nite I spanked your peepee for being stupid on a thread and now your trolling me...how cute of you. What a cum dumpster you are...
A bogus thread about Woods cheating draws out people who don't care for Woods.
lol
I understand the dislike, btw, even though I happen to be a fan.
If Tiger had done what Schwartzel did today with his iron, he would be lambasted. They all giggled when Schwartzel did it. Given the pressure he's always under, I tend to forgive Tiger for his outbursts on the course. And I couldn't possibly care less about his sex life off the course. But that's just me, I guess.
Looking forward to a great next few days in Scotland!
The provisional was fine. As any other player would do in that circumstance, Tiger hit the provisional just in case his original shot was out of bounds or lost.
It ended up being neither out of bounds nor lost. But it was unplayable.
Since it wasn't playable, he chose to take a drop and play it. It was a 1-stroke penalty.
There were no rules broken, and no cheating.
People I get the hate for Woods, I really do... But you really need to calm down a bit... No rule was broken!
Who the fuck is this woman doing color commentating for each shot they show? Who's great idea was this?
Do not need to constantly hear a woman's voice while watching the Open.