mr.hockey4242
Well-Known Member
that's exactly why AG is a better all around player. Because he is good at both of those things.
Just because he is a better all around player doesn't mean he is more valuable than the two guys that don't play defense. Their offense is simply that good. But AG's impact on offense is much closer to those two than their impact on defense is to him.
That's where I disagree.
I think the way those guys impact on offense is far greater. Jumpers, free throws, off the dribble.
You are acting like they are traffic cones on D which is not the case at all.
Gordon is very good and will be great but he's lacking the dimensions on offense.