Winsipedia

[FSUmanager]

That was back when Bama sucked. Typical for FSU.

Yeah like FSU was really good in 07. They were 7-6 that season. Yep just like FSU. Not their fault that Bama was just as bad as FSU(7-6). So what was the point?

To make the point FSU lost to KENTUCKY in the bowl game.

 

[bamabear82]

That was a rough time right there.

 

[The Authority]

Yeah like FSU was really good in 07. They were 7-6 that season. Yep just like FSU. Not their fault that Bama was just as bad as FSU(7-6). So what was the point?

To make the point FSU lost to KENTUCKY in the bowl game.

Point is its not the same as beating Bama today just like FSU's title run this past year wasn't the same as all other BCS winners title run.

 

[Olyduck]

same for Oregon. Beating Oregon now something to talk about. pre 94 meh no big deal. 94-2000 depends on who it was.

 

[RoboticDreams]

USC is 0 - 3 vs. North Carolina

There's something I didn't know.

 

[Camfantasy]

Point is its not the same as beating Bama today just like FSU's title run this past year wasn't the same as all other BCS winners title run.

U still mad?

 

[FSUmanager]

Point is its not the same as beating Bama today just like FSU's title run this past year wasn't the same as all other BCS winners title run.

Really? They were ranked when they played. FSU was not. Is it the same team as now? Nope, but neither is FSU. SO again your point is moot. I was pointing out an obvious flaw in the website. You are taking to another level of jealousy as usual. Too bad OSU cannot beat any team with a pulse.

 

[TROJAN-MAN]

same for Oregon. Beating Oregon now something to talk about. pre 94 meh no big deal. 94-2000 depends on who it was.

LOL you sound like a Gator fan, football didn't start for them until 1990

 

[Olyduck]

LOL you sound like a Gator fan, football didn't start for them until 1990

I never said that. Oregon just didnt matter before then. before that if USC beat them they were supposed to. from 94 on it was supposed to happen but less of an upset if Oregon won. now, lately USC beat Oregon and that was the upset.

 

[theSabanator20]

USC is 0 - 3 vs. North Carolina

Go Heels!!!!!

 

[KnightAndDay]

USC is 0 - 2 vs. North Carolina

fify

Winsipedia - USC Trojans vs. North Carolina Tar Heels football series history

 

[BusSport]

Not up to date. Has FSU with zero wins against Bama. FSU beat Bama in 2007 in Jacksonville. Still nifty.

2007 FSU vacated wins that season.

Yes they did, but I thought that they vacated only 5 wins that season and those were the last 5 wins. But who the hell knows.

No. FSU vacated 5 wins from the 2006 season, not the 2007 season, for which every win of the season, all 7, including the one against Alabama, were vacated.

I was pointing out an obvious flaw in the website.

There is no "obvious flaw in the website" since the win against Alabama was vacated.

 

[FSUmanager]

No. FSU vacated 5 wins from the 2006 season, not the 2007 season, for which every win of the season, all 7, including the one against Alabama, were vacated.



There is no "obvious flaw in the website" since the win against Alabama was vacated.

I thought they split them, but was not sure which season had which number of wins vacated. So you are correct no flaw.

 

[boxedlunch]

No. FSU vacated 5 wins from the 2006 season, not the 2007 season, for which every win of the season, all 7, including the one against Alabama, were vacated.



There is no "obvious flaw in the website" since the win against Alabama was vacated.

It has it's share of flaws, but no more than usual, fewer, in fact.

What they do is really cool, but I have issues with sites that steal other people's research and work without credit.

 

[4down20]

It has it's share of flaws, but no more than usual, fewer, in fact.

What they do is really cool, but I have issues with sites that steal other people's research and work without credit.

steal other peoples research? It's just stats.

 

[boxedlunch]

steal other peoples research? It's just stats.

Stats from data researched by others.

 

[4down20]

Stats from data researched by others.

The type of stats they are using are available for free. It's really basic stats.

Seems like a well done site to me.

 

[boxedlunch]

The type of stats they are using are available for free. It's really basic stats.

Seems like a well done site to me.

"Available for free" does not mean you can use it without credit. That's low.

However it is a well done site and I like a lot of what he does. If he'd just credit his sources.

 

[Olyduck]

by available for free means it is public records and knowledge. If i had the know how of webdesign and all that programming and whatever else is needed I could do this. its not like someone found the cure for cancer and someone stole it and posted it.

 

[boxedlunch]

by available for free means it is public records and knowledge. If i had the know how of webdesign and all that programming and whatever else is needed I could do this. its not like someone found the cure for cancer and someone stole it and posted it.

TV programs are broadcast across the air all the time. It's illegal to tape them and broadcast them as your own. Because something is free, does not mean you are free to do whatever you like with it. Regardless, it's a scummy thing to do to take somebody's work and post it as your own. If it were the cancer, at least you can say you're trying to cure people. What justification do people have for claiming others work as their own on football stats? How tough is it to say where you got it and to give credit where credit is due?