- Thread starter
- #1
Wisconsin played 10 regular season P5 opponents (11 P5 opponents if you count BYU) which both the B1G and SEC do. Now factor in Wiscy played an extra game than Bama by playing in the B1G championship game and that leaves them with 11 P5 opponents vs Bama's 9.Wisconsin didn't play any OOC game from another P5 League. That's why it took them
13 weeks to even make the final four. That committee was not going to reward a team
that ducked competition for the entire season. They would set a horrible precedent.
If Whisky had beaten OSU they would have gotten in as an unbeaten, but even that wasn't a
sure thing.
Wiscy played 11 P5 opponents this year vs Bama's 9 not to mention Wiscy won their division and Bama didn't win shit.Is this a serious question or another troll bait? Because it's obvious.
Wisconsin had a better record than Bama, played more P5 teams than Bama not to mention they won their division.This is a clever trap to get @Great Dayne so we can all make fun of him
Wisconsin had a better record than Bama, played more P5 teams than Bama not to mention they won their division.
This ^^Bama has the name. It sure helps.
According to this article.
If Alabama and Wisconsin were to play on a neutral site, the line would....
Bama -14.
It doesn't help Wisconsin that they have a shit stain known only as the @Great Dayne
Which top-10 team would have best odds against Alabama?
Those odds are a little outdated. Bama of course would be favored against Wisconsin but how the game would go depends heavily on which Bama the Badgers are facing. Is it the injured Bama we saw the last few weeks of the regular season that struggled mightily against the run? Wisky would give that team all it could handle and more. A fully healthy Bama suffocates Wisconsins run heavy offense and, as long as they don't shoot themselves in the foot, dominates the game
Right, troll bait it is then. carry on.
TBH - I was just throwing a shit argument into a shit thread.