- Thread starter
- #1
I actually think Newton is equal to or better than Luck, so I take B in a landslide.
What about subbing Harvin for Maclin. IMO it doesn't make a big difference
Would probably rather have maclin than harvin!!! Harvin is great, but he jsut cant stay healthy...
Its just that in a dynasty potential is still a factor, Luck is still more appealing than newton... But i agree...
I don't necessarily agree that Luck has more long term upside. Newton is pretty damn good and very young.
Cam is one year older and Luck has much better weapons. I have Cam but was looking into Luck because of his skill players. I have both Jennings and Moreno so I don't think I need both.
Cam is one year older and Luck has much better weapons. I have Cam but was looking into Luck because of his skill players. I have both Jennings and Moreno so I don't think I need both.
well first off, just because you don't need them doesn't mean you should give them away.
Secondly if you're going to give one away. . Let it be Moreno. The guy was nothing more than a product of Peyton Manning. He won't enjoy near the success in Miami. Jennings on the other hand, broke out in Oakland of all places, where there was NOTHING around him. If either has a better shot at sustaining what they did last year it's Jennings by a landslide