Maverick426h
Junior Mint
Yeah, but doesn't the guy want $9 million!? Maybe he's worth it, maybe he's not, but that is a ridiculous amount of money for a defenseman.
Yeah, but doesn't the guy want $9 million!? Maybe he's worth it, maybe he's not, but that is a ridiculous amount of money for a defenseman.
I'd give up the next 3-4 1st rounders and (insert name(s) ) for Weber in a second.
Weber is a proven top of the shelf commodity and with the depth that we have at forward to trade......shiiiiit it's a no brainer.
I also agree with the Briere talk and everything else that was said. I just feel there's no sense in doing any half measures when a top d-man is out there to be had.
.02
i mean seriously what do we need first rounders for at this point? we are starting 8 rookies currently ha and still second place i may add
Yep - Yep - Yep
Goddamn I hope Homer can or would pull this off..
I know I would be on cloud 9 and ordering a Weber jersey instantly if it were to happen. haha
...and fuck Lilja.....cut his ass so Shea can have his number.![]()
Yeah, but doesn't the guy want $9 million!? Maybe he's worth it, maybe he's not, but that is a ridiculous amount of money for a defenseman.
There is no team that will pay him 9 million per
if it was for 2 or 3 years, i would consider it.. maybe not for the flyers cause they dont have the space.. but he's probably the best dman out there
the problem i've had with almost every contract has been the duration, not the amount.. signing guys for 5+ years is just too risky.. sure it looks good when you have it pan out and you have a hart trophy candidate for 3 mil, but it looks really bad when you have a 4.9 mil liability, a goalie who is underporfming in year 1 of 9, and two models of inconsistency making 4 and 6.5 mil respectively
if i were a GM, 5 years would be my max contract length, and you'd have to be something special to get more than 3 (ie. giroux).. even if that meant paying more per year
I'd give up the next 3-4 1st rounders and (insert name(s) ) for Weber in a second.
.02
Soooo sign him as an RFA? Yes please
Soooo sign him as an RFA? Yes please
oy.. that has a 'blow up the team in 3 years' tied to it.. hell no to trading all your first round picks.. the cabinet is bare, in two or three years when schenn and coots come off their rookie salaries, the flyers will have to shed salary like crazy to keep them.. and i realize timo, briere, and hartnell will be off the books, but thats a #1 dman and 2 top 6 forwards that you'll have to replace.. who's going to do that? nobody will come at a level the flyers can afford
you HAVE to build through the draft. absolutely have to.
Soooo sign him as an RFA? Yes please
oy.. that has a 'blow up the team in 3 years' tied to it.. hell no to trading all your first round picks.. the cabinet is bare, in two or three years when schenn and coots come off their rookie salaries, the flyers will have to shed salary like crazy to keep them.. and i realize timo, briere, and hartnell will be off the books, but thats a #1 dman and 2 top 6 forwards that you'll have to replace.. who's going to do that? nobody will come at a level the flyers can afford
you HAVE to build through the draft. absolutely have to.
I get what you're saying also BH, but there are many combination of moves that can be made to accomodate Weber and his contract.
Briere - Carle - Jagr gone? I'm cool with that.![]()
I get what you're saying also BH, but there are many combination of moves that can be made to accomodate Weber and his contract.
Briere - Carle - Jagr gone? I'm cool with that.![]()
Our team is YOUNG. If there was ever a time to make a statement in the rfa world, this would be it.
Our only aging players are Timonen and Jagr. The rest are middle of the road or younger. We can live without a 1st round pick for a few years. The young dman you want is just not going to develop quick enough to contribute with this team who is ready to win now.
I know it's a risk, but I would do it in a heartbeat.
see i'm not ok with that.. that obviously wont be enough to get weber, especially since combined they only have a year left of contract after this season
the preds are only going to want superstar prospects, i.e. it will have to be schenn or coots (because they'll get it elsewhere if the flyers dont offer it) plus a roster dman which would be either mesz or coburn (timo is too old, carle is FA, the others aren't good enough).. plus probably at least 1 first round pick..
so for example, the trade would be schenn, coburn, and a 1st for weber.. you clear.. 5ish from the cap and say conservatively weber gets 8 per year.. you still gotta move 3 more in space just to be even in the trade.. so we let carle go in FA and we're about even.. except we're now missing 2 dmen and a top 6 (hopefully) forward.. resign jagr at 3 and taking in to account jvr's raise (about 4 mil) and you wipe out the salary cap increase this summer, plus probably 2 mil.. so you're about 2 mil over the cap with a lineup that looks like:
jagr.giroux.hartnell
voracek.briere.jvr
read.coots.simmonds
rinaldo.talbot.sestito
weber.timo
gust.mesz
bourdon.marshall
bryz/bob
do we really think that team is better than the one we have now? cause i dont.. you're a little weaker up front with the loss of schenn and jagr at 40, you're obviously the same in net.. but on defense you basically have 2 ultra reliable guys, 1 that is capable of being a stud, but just as capable of sucking dick.. and 3 guys that deserve to battle for the 6th spot, not have spots 4-6.. plus you dont have the 1st round pick to take a d-prospect that you could maybe hope was good enough to crack the lineup in year 1.. and to top it all off, you still have 2 mil in cap space to find
and thats all if the numbers break in our favor with pronger on LTIR and the timing works out that we can stay under the 10% offseason modifier then switch people to LTIR to get under the cap, prior to the 10% modifier ending (which i'm not sure on)
i freaking love weber, and if there was one guy i'd want to see on the flyers it'd be him.. i just dont see how it could work out