Yea you are too stupid to realize you are way out of your league here.
Yea you are too stupid to realize you are way out of your league here.
So you ignore that you are a retard as i have proven. Okay.No it’s a little more clear than that
View attachment 224416
Yes that is how you compare conferences, you go and look at 1 off games with the bottom teams. LMFAO if only you had a clue what you were talking about.Ok let’s take the bottom 3 teams of each conference since they had head to head matchups. Already showed the Colorado/Nebraska result here are the other two:
View attachment 224417 View attachment 224418
Ok head to head has no merit - got it thanks for the lesson. I guess playing on the field doesn’t mean shit.Yes that is how you compare conferences, you go and look at 1 off games with the bottom teams. LMFAO if only you had a clue what you were talking about.
Even then though Oregon would have the worst resume of the 2 loss champs.It's not a matter of more deserving. My argument is the committee won't put in a 2-loss non conference champ over a 2 loss conference champ. The committee themselves have said that conference titles are held higher than most other things.
I would bet with you, but this scenario will never happen so there's no point lol.
Rutgers lost to Boston College I guess the ACC is better also
But are we really having a theoretical argument if all falls to absolute shit if Oregon gets in
Closest was 07...Oregon didn't get in then either.