- Thread starter
- #1
PhilSimms11
Well-Known Member
It's considering changes to its conference championship game because SMU had to sweat it out during the CFP announcement. They're considering...
-Giving the regular season champion a bye and having teams that finished 2nd and 3rd play in the CCG.
WHAT?
-Have the top-4 teams play the final week of the regular season...1st vs 4th and 2nd vs 3rd with the two winners meeting in the CCG.
How in the hell would that work?
This is all dumb as hell.
I'll say it again. The ACC Championship Game was unnecessary. SMU (11-1, 8-0) was the only team in conference to run the table. But, they want a CCG to make money so, they'll just have to eat it if things don't go their way.
-Giving the regular season champion a bye and having teams that finished 2nd and 3rd play in the CCG.
WHAT?
-Have the top-4 teams play the final week of the regular season...1st vs 4th and 2nd vs 3rd with the two winners meeting in the CCG.
How in the hell would that work?
This is all dumb as hell.
I'll say it again. The ACC Championship Game was unnecessary. SMU (11-1, 8-0) was the only team in conference to run the table. But, they want a CCG to make money so, they'll just have to eat it if things don't go their way.