• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Week 2 Consensus Power Rankings

Schmoopy1000

When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
27,081
11,796
1,033
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,005.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We all know that power ranking aren't really true until about Week 4 or 5. By that time, first game jitters, adrenalin rushes and just unfamiliarity are behind every player. Week two will begin to sort the pile.

Only three teams in NFL history have started the season 0-2 and won the Super Bowl. 1993 (Cowboys), 2001 (Patriots), 2007 (Giants)

Only four others started 0-2 and made it to the Super Bowl 1996(Patriots), 1998(Jets), 2003(Eagles), 2014(Colts)

Just an FYI
I may be getting old & losing my memory, but I dont remember the Jets ever going to a superbowl since Joe Namath.
 

Schmoopy1000

When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
27,081
11,796
1,033
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,005.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Aggregate power ranking scores of 12 popular sports sites:

Sources: Sports Illustrated, ESPN, NFL.com, CBS Sports, The Ringer, The Athletic, NBC Sports, USA Today, Sporting News, Yahoo, Bleacher Report, Athlon

1. Tampa Bay: Avg. 1.33, High 1, Low 2
2. Kansas City: Avg. 1.83, High 1, Low 3
3. LA Rams: Avg. 3.75, High 1, Low 6
4. Seattle: Avg. 4.83, High 3, Low 8
5. Cleveland: Avg. 6.58 High 4, Low 12
6. San Francisco: Avg. 7.08, High 3, Low 14
7. Pittsburgh: Avg. 7.75, High 4, Low 11
8. Buffalo: Avg. 7.75, High 5, Low 10
9. New Orleans: Avg. 8.25, High 5, Low 13
10. Arizona: Avg. 10.08, High 6, Low 17
11. Baltimore: Avg. 11.5, High 5, Low 18
12. Green Bay: Avg. 11.92, High 6, Low 17
13. LA Chargers: Avg. 12.42, High 9, Low 16
14. Miami: Avg. 13.25, High 10, Low 15
15. Dallas: Avg. 14.75, High 9, Low 19
16. New England: Avg. 16.67, High 15, Low 20
17. Denver: Avg. 17.42, High 9, Low 26
18. Las Vegas: Avg. 17.75, High 12, Low 22
19. Tennessee: Avg. 19.17, High 14, Low 24
20. Philadelphia: Avg. 20.42, High 17, Low 24
21. Indianapolis: Avg. 20.42, High 16, Low 25
22. Washington: Avg. 20.75, High 17, Low 27
23. Carolina: Avg. 23.17, High 21, Low 26
24. Cincinnati: Avg. 23.42, High 16, Low 28
25. Minnesota: Avg. 24.33, High 20, Low 26
26. Chicago: Avg. 24.67, High 22, Low 26
27. NY Giants: Avg. 28.5, High 27, Low 30
28. Houston: Avg. 28.58, High 27, Low 31
29. Atlanta: Avg. 28.92, High 26, Low 31
30. Detroit: Avg. 29.08, High 25, Low 31
31. NY Jets: Avg. 29.58, High 28, Low 31
32. Jacksonville: Avg. 32, High 32, Low 32
Pfft...
Way to show your complete Bias in Power rankings.
Why wouldnt you do it in a more unbiased way like RTK?

Stupid logical people
 

Schmoopy1000

When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
27,081
11,796
1,033
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,005.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I feel like there is selective overreaction to week 1 but it is what it is.

Niners secondary is a question mark. I would have them as the 4th place NFC West team currently.
Well even lets say you are right.
The way to not over react to one week of football is to not make drastic changes due to just one week. (to be fair)
 

Schmoopy1000

When all else fails, Smack em' in the Mouth!
27,081
11,796
1,033
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,005.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Oh snap, I caught the 2014 one but totally missed that one. Elway and the Broncos beat the Jets in the CG.
Maybe he meant to say Championship game & not superbowl :noidea:
 

SteelersPride

Well-Known Member
86,295
18,659
1,033
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Location
Heinz Field
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,454.99
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The ONLY rankings that matter.

Youre Welcome GIF by MOODMAN
 

mrschaney

Well-Known Member
4,756
1,316
173
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I saw the official power rankings and Minnesota jumped past he Bengals even though the Bengals beat them.
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
38,613
11,391
1,033
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 8,000.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Did you mean Browns in that tier with the Bills, Chiefs, etc. Clayton or did you just forget about them?
Browns are somewhere in between a team that needs great QB play and a team with a good defense. I probably should have used 'mold' instead of 'tiers'
 
4,533
6,081
533
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Location
North of Patagonia / South of Iguazu Falls
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I find the anomalies interesting.

Denver comes in at 17, but was voted as high as 9 and low as 26, which are both larger than standard variations (+8, and -9 from the average). So it appears even a panel of "experts" cannot agree on how good they will be.

Any thoughts on this? Is Denver closer to 9, 17, or 26?

1631823455157.png
 

returnofjakedog

Well-Known Member
3,960
2,759
293
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Location
Port Townsend
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
That is a pretty wide spread but I think that mid range is pretty close. They are in tough with the Chiefs, Chargers and Raiders in that division. Really good defense, solid but not spectacular QB play and some weapons but I'm not sold on Fangio being a HC. I could be wrong though. They could be a dark horse WC team.
Actually when you look at all of the votes Denver not only had the largest deviations but also has more "outliers" than any other team. They have 7 in the 15 to 19 range, but 5 rankings with 4 or more deviation from the average.

Ok, I know it is all kinda boring to crunch these numbers but I don't see that any other team has more than 3 (Raiders, Arizona, GB, possibly more??) I guess all of these teams are still considered relatively unknown quantities by comparison in terms of public perception.

All of this should be somewhat sorted in the next few weeks.
 

Southieinnc

Do Your Job!
27,621
12,054
1,033
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
Out of the desert!
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,532.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I find the anomalies interesting.

Denver comes in at 17, but was voted as high as 9 and low as 26, which are both larger than standard variations (+8, and -9 from the average). So it appears even a panel of "experts" cannot agree on how good they will be.

Any thoughts on this? Is Denver closer to 9, 17, or 26?
Let's play some games?
 
Top