- Thread starter
- #1
gkekoa
Well-Known Member
1- Kendall Fuller, CB
2- Su'a Cravens, ILB
3- Graham Glasgow, C
4- Jayron Kearse, S
2- Su'a Cravens, ILB
3- Graham Glasgow, C
4- Jayron Kearse, S
no d/lineman in the first 4 rounds and he is credible ?
The first thing I thought of as well. With such a deep DL class I'm trying to figure out what that means. At first I was thnking DL in the first. But maybe they feel they can find first round value in round 2 so they go in another direction.no d/lineman in the first 4 rounds and he is credible ?
I would be very surprised if the DL was bypassed in rounds 1 and 2. Jeremiah from NFL Network latest mock had us taking the OLB Lee from Ohio St.. Hey gk I guess he doesn't think Murphy is a starter or even a backup for that matter. Ha Ha. Could you imagine if Lee was taken and we signed Galette back?
Ii do agree that if he is the BPA, we would take him. But the odds are he will not be. And if he is and we take him, that pick has nothing to do with Murphy and his play. We took another OLB because he represented the best player out there. You always try and draw this correlation and it just doesn't exist. If anything, it would be that they don't think they will agree to terms with Gallette is why they might need another OLB.I agree with you. I don't want him. I just think it would be hilarious if we did take him. skinsdad said if he was the BPA he would take him.
Nope. It has to do with Lee was the best player available. Not that they were weak at OLB. Do you not understand what SM says when he drafts by BPA and not need? Its a very simple concept.The key here is Gallette. If Galette signs in March and we do take Lee @21 then that does have a lot to do with Murphys play
Its not my nonsense, its SMs. But your are right. He probably doesn't really know what he is doing.....If that happens jy than Lee is moving inside. Simple as that. Not your BPA nonsense. gk that is pretty bold to say Fuller is a first round pick.