Triple Espresso of Coffee Talk

[ChiSoxFan]

Sometimes you gotta wash your face and if there are only air dryers...what are ya gonna do???

 

[forty_three]

Holy fuck he's unhinged.

I mean why on earth does he care about Joe Biden at this point?

Everyone who should be able to beat him in an election is on/in his mind. He has to pre-emptively belittle them to bring them down to the level of his tiny, tiny hands.

Plus fecal laced wind is bound to give you cancer

How to they keep those windmills so clean and white?

Front, but only after urinating and hot water and soap.

I just really avoid the air dryer.

I avoid these newfangled urinals, too.

 

[forty_three]

Yeah, and if God wanted us to have guns, why weren't they mentioned either?

 

[thedddd]

Yeah, and if God wanted us to have guns, why weren't they mentioned either?

For that matter why isn't televangelists mentioned or the actual word "the bible"?

 

[scoutyjones2]

Should she really be teaching children?

Lauren Miranda, 25, a former math teacher at Bellport Middle School on Long Island, said she took the "old" photo one morning when she was getting ready in her bedroom and sent it "to the person she was seeing at the time." She never expected it to go public, she said.


"I think when anybody sends a picture they only expect it to be received by the person that they sent it to and nobody else," Miranda said.

 

[forty_three]

Should she really be teaching children?

Lauren Miranda, 25, a former math teacher at Bellport Middle School on Long Island, said she took the "old" photo one morning when she was getting ready in her bedroom and sent it "to the person she was seeing at the time." She never expected it to go public, she said.


"I think when anybody sends a picture they only expect it to be received by the person that they sent it to and nobody else," Miranda said.

She is a normal human with a healthy attitude toward her body and whose privacy was violated by her ex.

So... yes? She should be able to teach?

 

[scoutyjones2]

She is a normal human with a healthy attitude toward her body and whose privacy was violated by her ex.

So... yes? She should be able to teach?

Her naivete is disturbing...that's my point. Who in this world, over the age of 12, doesn't understand that once you send shit thru the airwaves, it's could come back to bite you in the ass? Especially "nude" pics. I mean that's the basis for the internet!

 

[Bloody Brian Burke]

Her naivete is disturbing...that's my point. Who in this world, over the age of 12, doesn't understand that once you send shit thru the airwaves, it's could come back to bite you in the ass? Especially "nude" pics. I mean that's the basis for the internet!

There are literally laws against this shit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/28/nyregion/revenge-****-law.html

 

[elocomotive]

Her naivete is disturbing...that's my point. Who in this world, over the age of 12, doesn't understand that once you send shit thru the airwaves, it's could come back to bite you in the ass? Especially "nude" pics. I mean that's the basis for the internet!

I think there is a difference between "oh, damn it, my ex is an asshole, I should have expected that" and being fired for taking a private photo.

The latter should have never happened. In particular, the school administrator in the hearing should NOT have displayed the photo during an administrative hearing. That is absurd behavior.

A teacher dancing topless in a public bar? Sure, fireable. Sending a private picture? No...fucking...way.

She will sue. She will win... big.

 

[scoutyjones2]

I think there is a difference between "oh, damn it, my ex is an asshole, I should have expected that" and being fired for taking a private photo.

The latter should have never happened. In particular, the school administrator in the hearing should NOT have displayed the photo during an administrative hearing. That is absurd behavior.

A teacher dancing topless in a public bar? Sure, fireable. Sending a private picture? No...fucking...way.

She will sue. She will win... big.

I have no problem with everything you say, I just think the naivete is just stupidity. That's all...I'm all for topless women. Hell, in Rochester, NY, where I was growing up, there were annual protests by women wanting to go topless in the park like us guys who were playing ultimate frisbee in the park, topless.

And yes, dudes are a-holes and shouldn't be sharing naked pics, but should it really be a crime?

 

[mooger_35]

Always cut off your head. Never show your head.

 

[KennyBanyeah]

Her naivete is disturbing...that's my point. Who in this world, over the age of 12, doesn't understand that once you send shit thru the airwaves, it's could come back to bite you in the ass? Especially "nude" pics. I mean that's the basis for the internet!

Who the fuck cares? It's a pair of titties. She teaches 11-13 year old children. If they haven't learned about the anatomy of human females by now they will be shortly.

It's not like she was blowbanging a herd of elk for fuck's sake.

 

[mooger_35]

LOL

 

[scoutyjones2]

Who the fuck cares? It's a pair of titties. She teaches 11-13 year old children. If they haven't learned about the anatomy of human females by now they will be shortly.

It's not like she was blowbanging a herd of elk for fuck's sake.

It's americur...we have our societal hangups on sex and nudity

 

[forty_three]

Her naivete is disturbing...that's my point. Who in this world, over the age of 12, doesn't understand that once you send shit thru the airwaves, it's could come back to bite you in the ass? Especially "nude" pics. I mean that's the basis for the internet!

Actually the basis of the Internet was free and open sharing of research between universities.

I have no problem with everything you say, I just think the naivete is just stupidity. That's all...I'm all for topless women. Hell, in Rochester, NY, where I was growing up, there were annual protests by women wanting to go topless in the park like us guys who were playing ultimate frisbee in the park, topless.

And yes, dudes are a-holes and shouldn't be sharing naked pics, but should it really be a crime?

Yes. Yes it should.

 

[jstewismybastardson]

 

[elocomotive]

Actually the basis of the Internet was free and open sharing of research between universities.

Yes. Yes it should.

Agreed. I think dehumanizing other people for revenge is generally shitty behavior and should be punishable. Especially since many of us make mistakes when we are young and those shouldn't haunt our personal and professional lives indefinitely. I generally think these types of crimes should be better defined and that we should decriminalize many of the nonviolent, self-inflicting drug crimes that overwhelm our system (and which the privatized prison systems depend on, because fuck them).

Fortunately, 41 states agree...

How Many States Have Revenge **** Laws?

As of 2019, 41 states and the District of Columbia have specific laws outlawing distribution of revenge ****. However, revenge **** laws are still relatively new and the laws are continuing to develop. In order to be guilty of this crime in most states, the distributor must be sending out pictures or a video that are considered sexual in nature, such as showing the victim's intimate body parts or engaging in a sexual act. Simply posting an unflattering picture of your ex in a bathing suit is not pornographic, absent any other circumstances, such as the victim's genitalia being visible.

Prohibited Actions

While each state has different laws, most generally define the crime of revenge **** as any person, with the intent to harass or annoy another who:

• Publishes or distributes electronic or printed photographs, pictures, or films that
• Show the genitals, anus, or female breast of the other person, or
• Depicts that person engaged in a sexual act.

 

[elocomotive]

That school system should not be firing that female teacher. They should be assisting in investigating whether or not the male teacher was responsibility for it's dissemination and helping the authorities with finding out if he is guilty of distributing illicit materials to minors. He may not be. Someone might have lifted it from him. He's lucky he's in one of the 9 states that don't have a revenge pron law.

While they are at it, suspend the administrator who fired the teacher and investigate if he should be fired.

If that school system has decent people in it, they'll do that. If they had decent counsel, they would have done that beforehand to avoid a law suit.

 

[forty_three]

That school system should not be firing that female teacher. They should be assisting in investigating whether or not the male teacher was responsibility for it's dissemination and helping the authorities with finding out if he is guilty of distributing illicit materials to minors. He may not be. Someone might have lifted it from him. He's lucky he's in one of the 9 states that don't have a revenge pron law.

While they are at it, suspend the administrator who fired the teacher and investigate if he should be fired.

If that school system has decent people in it, they'll do that. If they had decent counsel, they would have done that beforehand to avoid a law suit.

This. There has been at least one case where a kid took a teacher's phone, got into it and found a nude (and the nude was her documenting a bruise from an accident) and sent it to himself and shared it around the school.

The kid broke several wire laws, invaded her privacy and the photo was never transmitted anywhere by her. Nothing happened to the kid and she lost her job (although she did make some cash in the lawsuit). It was the same "role model" bullshit.

Rules about this stuff are fucking caveman era.


And that's without going into the puritan type little thinking that leads the powers that be to be so fucking afraid of tits in the first place.

 

[elocomotive]

And that's without going into the puritan type little thinking that leads the powers that be to be so fucking afraid of tits in the first place.

I'm not down with the Puritanism, but I have always found it weird that some women wear work clothes that shows substantial cleavage. Just cover it up at work (both sexes) is my preference.

I always joke with people that it's the equivalent of if guys had pants with two holes in them where you could just see a LITTLE BIT of the testicles. Not the whole things! That's indecent. But just a little peak.

Just enough to get a sense of it... and then you look away!!