• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Top 10 poll #4: #4 player in history - Runoff

Who is the #4 player in baseball history?


  • Total voters
    36
  • This poll will close: .

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,661
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
And yet his ERA and WHIP and era are all strong when it comes to the playoffs.
His career ERA is 4.49, and he shit the bed numerous times in “must win” games. He wasn’t just some #3 pitcher who the doggies HOPED would offer some innings and give them a chance to win. He was THE guy, who they needed big games from, and he just didn’t deliver those games when they were needed.
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
38,992
11,626
1,033
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,000.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Kershaw actually gets/got a LOT of love on the Giants board here throughout his career.

edit - maybe I'm looking at his stats wrong. nevermind. I need to stop doing this while working.
 

DHoey

Well-Known Member
5,920
1,722
173
Joined
Feb 20, 2015
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,893.51
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we were JUST looking at pitchers, I think I would probably have to go with Paige, Maddux, Seaver, and WJohnson as my preliminary short list. With my un-studied initial vote going to Paige.
Add another Johnson into that list
 

DHoey

Well-Known Member
5,920
1,722
173
Joined
Feb 20, 2015
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,893.51
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I am not certain he belongs with THAT class, but sure. But I would put Clemens on the board before Randy.
You don't think he belongs with Maddux and Clemens?
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,661
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You don't think he belongs with Maddux and Clemens?
Certainly not a hill I am willing to die on, but yes, I view Maddux as being better. The difference is a hair-width, but you need to draw that line somewhere.
 

Clayton

Well-Known Member
38,992
11,626
1,033
Joined
May 17, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 7,000.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we're going off primes then Id pick Clemens or Gibson. Maybe they both have an '*' for different reasons but Gibsons is more legit imo. No issue with Maddux being the first pitcher off the board, though
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,661
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we're going off primes then Id pick Clemens or Gibson. Maybe they both have an '*' for different reasons but Gibsons is more legit imo. No issue with Maddux being the first pitcher off the board, though
Gibson I keep forgetting about. And the change in the shape of the field is something he had zero to do with, so I have a hard time using that against him. But I would be ok adding Clemens and Gibson to the list I mentioned earlier. And Randy as well, seeing as he is SOOO close (though I do feel that Maddux, at least, is better, so Randy wouldn’t be able to win, imho — 900 additional innings between contemporaries is pretty convincing).
 

MilkSpiller22

Gorilla
35,319
7,170
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 89,217.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we're going off primes then Id pick Clemens or Gibson. Maybe they both have an '*' for different reasons but Gibsons is more legit imo. No issue with Maddux being the first pitcher off the board, though


Clemens Would be the choice... but with Bonds dropping on this list, i would not even entertain putting clemens up as an option...

I have Randy and Pedro both being better than Maddux...
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,661
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Clemens Would be the choice... but with Bonds dropping on this list, i would not even entertain putting clemens up as an option...

I have Randy and Pedro both being better than Maddux...
Almost 900 additional IP for Maddux (in the same era) makes him a clear better option than Johnson. Johnson was a lefty and a K artist while Maddux was a P2C and a righty, but everything else, numbers-wise, is very similar. Basically it comes down to lefty vs more innings. I prefer innings to arm, personally.

Lefty/righty is future predictor vs a looking back summary. When looking at a career in the rear-view mirror, whether he did it with his right or left arm really doesn’t move the needle for me in any way.
 

MilkSpiller22

Gorilla
35,319
7,170
533
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 89,217.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Almost 900 additional IP for Maddux (in the same era) makes him a clear better option than Johnson. Johnson was a lefty and a K artist while Maddux was a P2C and a righty, but everything else, numbers-wise, is very similar. Basically it comes down to lefty vs more innings. I prefer innings to arm, personally.

Lefty/righty is future predictor vs a looking back summary. When looking at a career in the rear-view mirror, whether he did it with his right or left arm really doesn’t move the needle for me in any way.


looking at their numbers blindly, i would actually probably have picked Maddux over Johnson...

but watching both pitch, everyone feared Johnson over maddux... most of that is because of style of pitching... one was a Strike out guy, the other was a control guy...

i think also, after the fact, i hear lots of stories about umpires helping maddux with the strike zone...

so i guess i am a victim here of what i hate... i hate over-ranking the players of old because of their legendary status and all the stories that make them so good...

and when i compare Randy and maddux, i am dinging maddux for the opposite reasons...
 

calsnowskier

Sarcastic F-wad
63,661
18,478
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Diego
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,900.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
looking at their numbers blindly, i would actually probably have picked Maddux over Johnson...

but watching both pitch, everyone feared Johnson over maddux... most of that is because of style of pitching... one was a Strike out guy, the other was a control guy...

i think also, after the fact, i hear lots of stories about umpires helping maddux with the strike zone...

so i guess i am a victim here of what i hate... i hate over-ranking the players of old because of their legendary status and all the stories that make them so good...

and when i compare Randy and maddux, i am dinging maddux for the opposite reasons...
Umpire aid sucks, and is why I am a HUGE proponant of the robo-umps whenever they are ready. But unfortunately, there is no way to confirm or deny any of that actually happened, so I CHOOSE to ignore it.

Randy get credit for the Kruk AB and the seagull, and Maddux gets “credit” for the professorial look and for “Chicks love the long ball”. Pluses and minus, but the numbers, while EXTREMELY close, imho, supports Maddux.

Either way, we have a lot of time before these two are actually on deck for this excercize.
 

chappee11

Esteemed Colleague
11,745
4,213
293
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Location
Laguna Beach, CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
This one's tough between Bonds and Cobb. I don't think Aaron is in the same category as those other two.

Cobb I never saw play. Bonds, I did, several times. Mainly, I think it would piss Cobb off if I vote for Bonds, so that's what I'll do.
Ty Cobb: <seething>
 

chappee11

Esteemed Colleague
11,745
4,213
293
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Location
Laguna Beach, CA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Aaron is the greatest accumulator in the history of the game. IMHO, he belongs lower down in the top 10 (probably just below Robinson and Henderson). But his accumulation was damn impressive…
There’s marginal accumulators(like a Harold Baines or a Biggio) but Aaron is not one of those. Aaron finished in the top 20 for MVP for NINETEEN straight years(13 of those years were top 10). Can anyone else make that claim??? It seems rather remarkable to me. He was absolutely elite for an incredibly long time. Health and durability are important attributes to possess.

I used to make this same argument against Emmitt Smith in football. I always argued that Barry Sanders was way better. But along the way I realized that there’s huge value in a guy who shows up every day and performs at a very high level. Don’t mark his durability against him.

Btw, I voted for Aaron. lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LHG

Cedrique

Well-Known Member
19,858
5,459
533
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 950.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
He was the OG stat padder! Basically hit 18 home runs a year for 30 years. That's some first class longevity but otherwise not a great player during most of his career.
Take away the first 3 seasons and the last 3 and he averaged over 38 home runs per season for 17 years. Yeah, pretty mediocre....
 

VikingFan2k2

Well-Known Member
6,932
3,030
293
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
A LOT of evidence that the whole “Racist Cobb” narrative was complete BS, created by a writer who just didnt like Cobb…

That's exactly what it was. Some jerk who spent a week interviewing Cobb at the end of his life a few times and used that to write an erroneous book to make a name for himself.
 

broncosmitty

Banned in Europe
94,066
28,017
1,033
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Location
Almost Paradise
Hoopla Cash
$ 16,206.54
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
That's exactly what it was. Some jerk who spent a week interviewing Cobb at the end of his life a few times and used that to write an erroneous book to make a name for himself.
Cobb still had enough life in him to call the publisher and tell them to stop the biography.

They just waited for him to die instead.
 
Top