ROMOTOOWENS
Well-Known Member
Absolutely would be. Best man always starts for Garrett and did in the playoffs
We lost.
Absolutely would be. Best man always starts for Garrett and did in the playoffs
Trying to say we lost because of Dak is as bad as those who pile too much blame on Tony. TEAM GAME, TEAM LOST. Give GB some f'n credit.We lost.
Trying to say we lost because of Dak is as bad as those who pile too much blame on Tony. TEAM GAME, TEAM LOST. Give GB some f'n credit.
Unless Tony plays CB, I don't see what more he could have done. I like Romo too, but that was Dak's first playoff game, as a rookie no less, and I thought he played well. What was Romo's playoff record? Are those all his fault? Can't play it both ways...His blinders will never allow him to see it
Trying to say we lost because of Dak is as bad as those who pile too much blame on Tony. TEAM GAME, TEAM LOST. Give GB some f'n credit.
It's no secret that I think at this stage of their careers that Romo is the better QB, but Dak DID NOT lose that game and there is absolutely no way you, I or anyone could say the outcome would've been different had Romo played. Here's the truth you are such a fan of Romo you fail to see he's not perfect. Green Bay won as a team Dallas lost as a team. End of story.Lol. Others wear blinders too. I never said it was Daks fault. Jarntt continues to pound it home that the better QB played. I maintain the hot hand played. We saw the same thing in 91, when Beurline started over Aikman in the playoffs. Once you lose for the year, it should be protocol to check out every little detail on why you lost and if something could have been different. All I know is we were the best team in the NFC all year with Dak at Qb. That's great. We lost though. How do we get better? You have to turn every stone.
It's no secret that I think at this stage of their careers that Romo is the better QB, but Dak DID NOT lose that game and there is absolutely no way you, I or anyone could say the outcome would've been different had Romo played. Here's the truth you are such a fan of Romo you fail to see he's not perfect. Green Bay won as a team Dallas lost as a team. End of story.
Real simple. You even suggesting Romo makes a difference is the same as those who continually blamed Romo for loses. You are now doing the same.There are plays in that game just like every game one can second guess, much like the Dez catch/ non catch game. If I have read it once, I have read it 40 times that Beasley was open. A couple of red zone possessions in that game we settled for FGs. One of them, he tried to go to Wit on back to back plays. I don't want to even talk about the spike. Maybe Romo does the same thing. None of this is my point. Jarntt continues to say Dak is better. I refuse to believe that.
Dak- maybe he was missed in the draft. Our coaches coached him for a week. I don't think going into the draft it was a plan to snag him with the 135th pick. As great as our scouting and GM is - he probably was their 5th or 6th choice for a QB. Look around the league, most starters were drafted in first or 2nd round. Now we can say all we want to that he is the next Brady or Russell Wilson. I see Alex Smith, maybe Steve McNair. That isn't an insult. Those guys are or were good Qbs. Nothing wrong with that. When you go back through the season, how many WOw plays did he really make. A few maybe. When I look at his body of work, 23 TD, 4 INt is when I say wow. Best seasonI have ever seen for a rookie. 2nd best for a first yr starter, behind Foles. The question is can he get better or how many other Qbs could have done the same. I know our 17 million dollar WR turned into a third/ fourth option. Maybe that's the way to go
Real simple. You even suggesting Romo makes a difference is the same as those who continually blamed Romo for loses. You are now doing the same.
Again I think Tony is better at this time, but Dak didn't lose that game. In fact like Tony he had the game winnable until the D gave up a play late allowing GB to win. Kind of the same story with Romo over the years.If that's what I'm doing so be it. I listened to the great Jimmy Johnson say after he saw Romo make 3 - 4 throws- the offense would be more explosive with Romo. Maybe we don't want to be explosive?? We are better suited to ground and pound.
Man you will never convince him lolAgain I think Tony is better at this time, but Dak didn't lose that game. In fact like Tony he had the game winnable until the D gave up a play late allowing GB to win. Kind of the same story with Romo over the years.
It's like a remake of a movie, the actors are replaced, but the ending doesn't change.
Man you will never convince him lol
For the love of God...stop the madness.
we were the best team in 07 and went one and out too.
Romo had the ball twice in the 4th qtr inside the opponents territory with a first down and couldn't get it done, yet NOW you wanna share the blame with our QB cause it FIT'S YOUR AGENDA.
LOL....you're a piece of work dudeu sure walked into that trap I set.
your agenda is for all to see and reading the different opinions, I'd say they all see it.As far as my AGENDA, what the fuck is that. Everyone has their own damn opinion. Yours is Playoff Advancement.
hardly...you set traps for me....remember?I guess I'm suppose to just sit back and take your crap and not respond