The Sushi Sabotage NFL Draft : CHAT

[Shanemansj13]

Damn light speed

 

[Nosferatu]

Damn light speed

Until now!

 

[CitySushi]

@femurov

 

[Shanemansj13]

@Hall

 

[Nosferatu]

@Hall

 

[Shanemansj13]

Jim Brown

@Nosferatu

 

[Nosferatu]

I textdid Mookie

 

[Nosferatu]

I did text UK, man we are flying today!

 

[Shanemansj13]

@Nosferatu you're up

 

[Nosferatu]

@Nosferatu you're up

Sorry, work got in the way of drafting dammit!

 

[Shanemansj13]

Sorry, work got in the way of drafting dammit!

hahaha you mean "pussy footing with a Pats fan"

 

[Nosferatu]

hahaha you mean "pussy footing with a Pats fan"

lolzzz yer up

 

[Nosferatu]

I did text Sushi

 

[MilkSpiller22]

before we get to the sabotage rounds... can we talk about the rules for it...

1. I propose that the players taken ALL have to be from the 1980s or later... kind of stupid sabotaging with players that nobody has even heard of...

2. whether or not the saboteur can change the defensive formation... Not saying you cant draft 3-4 defenders in a clear 4-3 formation... But we should talk about whether the saboteur can draft that extra player to change the formation...

 

[Nosferatu]

before we get to the sabotage rounds... can we talk about the rules for it...

1. I propose that the players taken ALL have to be from the 1980s or later... kind of stupid sabotaging with players that nobody has even heard of...

2. whether or not the saboteur can change the defensive formation... Not saying you cant draft 3-4 defenders in a clear 4-3 formation... But we should talk about whether the saboteur can draft that extra player to change the formation...

We already talked about #2 and I agree with #1

 

[Shanemansj13]

before we get to the sabotage rounds... can we talk about the rules for it...

1. I propose that the players taken ALL have to be from the 1980s or later... kind of stupid sabotaging with players that nobody has even heard of...

2. whether or not the saboteur can change the defensive formation... Not saying you cant draft 3-4 defenders in a clear 4-3 formation... But we should talk about whether the saboteur can draft that extra player to change the formation...

1. I agree on this one but I think 60's or 70's and up is FINE

2. Pretty sure we said before you had to draft for their particular formation, which is how it should be.

 

[Nosferatu]

FOR THE SABOTAGE PART OF THE DRAFT YOU HAVE TO DRAFT PLAYERS WHO FIT THEIR FORMATION ON DEFENSE AND ALL THE PLAYERS HAVE TO HAVE BEEN DRAFTED NO EARLIER THAN 1980.


@UK Cowboy
@CitySushi
@femurov
@MookieMonstah50
@Hall
@Stakesarehigh
@tducey
@MilkSpiller22
@Shanemansj13

 

[Nosferatu]

1. I agree on this one but I think 60's or 70's and up is FINE

2. Pretty sure we said before you had to draft for their particular formation, which is how it should be.

I agree with Milk #1 we can find random nobodies that we've never heard of that made a pro bowl form the 60's, that's kinda dumb IMO.

 

[CitySushi]

FOR THE SABOTAGE PART OF THE DRAFT YOU HAVE TO DRAFT PLAYERS WHO FIT THEIR FORMATION ON DEFENSE AND ALL THE PLAYERS HAVE TO HAVE BEEN DRAFTED NO EARLIER THAN 1980.

If we're drafting all 1980's and up, do you think we should remove the HOF stipulation for 2 of the 8 players? Think it'll be better to do that.

 

[Shanemansj13]

I agree with Milk #1 we can find random nobodies that we've never heard of that made a pro bowl form the 60's, that's kinda dumb IMO.

I say 1970's or do what Sushi suggested...