The Sushi Sabotage NFL Draft : CHAT

[Nosferatu]

I did text Femur

 

[Nosferatu]

@MookieMonstah50

 

[UK Cowboy]

@MookieMonstah50

Back to you Brother

 

[MilkSpiller22]

do we even have to do rounds for the sabotage?? or can we condense the rounds?? no need to make it 8 rounds long, when chances are nobody is going to be drafting the same players...

I think we should either make it 4 rounds of 2 or 2 rounds of 4 players.... Probably prefer 4 rounds of 2 players...

 

[Stakesarehigh]

do we even have to do rounds for the sabotage?? or can we condense the rounds?? no need to make it 8 rounds long, when chances are nobody is going to be drafting the same players...

I think we should either make it 4 rounds of 2 or 2 rounds of 4 players.... Probably prefer 4 rounds of 2 players...

Four rounds of two sounds good imo

 

[Shanemansj13]

do we even have to do rounds for the sabotage?? or can we condense the rounds?? no need to make it 8 rounds long, when chances are nobody is going to be drafting the same players...

I think we should either make it 4 rounds of 2 or 2 rounds of 4 players.... Probably prefer 4 rounds of 2 players...

idk we might be going for the same targets. We are going for worst of the worst that still made a PB. I'm not seeing a lot out there...or maybe I need to do more research, that being said...

I think 2 of 4 rounds sounds better.

 

[Mookie]

idk we might be going for the same targets. We are going for worst of the worst that still made a PB. I'm not seeing a lot out there...or maybe I need to do more research, that being said...

I think 2 of 4 rounds sounds better.

Screw you and your research haha...5 x PB and up is fine for your selections

 

[MilkSpiller22]

idk we might be going for the same targets. We are going for worst of the worst that still made a PB. I'm not seeing a lot out there...or maybe I need to do more research, that being said...

I think 2 of 4 rounds sounds better.

both are fine.... I prefer 4 rounds for 2 reasons... 1 because there is no reason to speed things up(ironic for someone who is proposing to condense the rounds). and second, just in case your strategy changes...

 

[Mookie]

both are fine.... I prefer 4 rounds for 2 reasons... 1 because there is no reason to speed things up(ironic for someone who is proposing to condense the rounds). and second, just in case your strategy changes...

A reason for not extending it is thas this is the "fun" part of the draft, and we are FLYING so far, so why not just let it play out for an extra day or so? I get your point tho and am fine either way

 

[Shanemansj13]

If someone had one year at All-Pro but no Pro Bowl are they eligible?

 

[Shanemansj13]

@Nosferatu

 

[MilkSpiller22]

If someone had one year at All-Pro but no Pro Bowl are they eligible?

that's kind of a stupid and irrelevant question... if you are gonna give someone a player who has an ALL-PRO you are not sabotaging well!!!

 

[Mookie]

that's kind of a stupid and irrelevant question... if you are gonna give someone a player who has an ALL-PRO you are not sabotaging well!!!

Shut up Milk!!!! Yes, Shane it's allowed. 2 x All-pros are even better

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Shut up Milk!!!! Yes, Shane it's allowed. 2 x All-pros are even better

if UK didn't draft Russell Wilson... I would have given him Russell Wilson... Just saying HE FUCKED UP!!!!

 

[Shanemansj13]

that's kind of a stupid and irrelevant question... if you are gonna give someone a player who has an ALL-PRO you are not sabotaging well!!!

Not really. I don't want to give any secrets away but you know someone can make an all-pro for something other than offense or defense

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Not really. I don't want to give any secrets away but you know someone can make an all-pro for something other than offense or defense

actually, that brings up another question, I think... @Nosferatu


those Special team studs, who don't really play anything else, should they count?? should there be a minimum of touches on those pro-bowl seasons(for WR/RBs)

 

[Shanemansj13]

actually, that brings up another question, I think... @Nosferatu


those Special team studs, who don't really play anything else, should they count?? should there be a minimum of touches on those pro-bowl seasons(for WR/RBs)

I see only that is clearly LISTED at WR...but never plays the position but he should be in the damn HOF LOL

 

[Shanemansj13]

actually, that brings up another question, I think... @Nosferatu


those Special team studs, who don't really play anything else, should they count?? should there be a minimum of touches on those pro-bowl seasons(for WR/RBs)

Simple fix. Games started or games started %

 

[Nosferatu]

Not really. I don't want to give any secrets away but you know someone can make an all-pro for something other than offense or defense

No special teams players

 

[Nosferatu]

We are using 8 rounds, it's the sabotage draft and you guys wanna lower the sabotage part of the draft, what sense does that make and of course we could be picking some of the same players.