Depth Charts » Projected Standings | FanGraphs Baseball
An Early Look at the Projected Standings | FanGraphs Baseball
They project the Rangers to finish in 3rd place with a record of 83-79.
Depth Charts » Projected Standings | FanGraphs Baseball
An Early Look at the Projected Standings | FanGraphs Baseball
They project the Rangers to finish in 3rd place with a record of 83-79.
I was interested to see how the amount of replies on this thread compared to last offseason. I was kind of surprised to see how many fewer replies we have had this offseason in comparison. We are on page 123 now and we started on page 123 on Dec. 7, 2014. It took us 36 days longer to get here this year.
Less to bitch about this offseason, I guess.
It's been a very quite off season for the Rangers. I find it hard to remember the site with so little news coming out. The quietest I've ever seen it.I was interested to see how the amount of replies on this thread compared to last offseason. I was kind of surprised to see how many fewer replies we have had this offseason in comparison. We are on page 123 now and we started on page 123 on Dec. 7, 2014. It took us 36 days longer to get here this year.
Those were my first thoughts. Not sure on their rationale since we are starting the year with Hamels and a better BP than we started with last year. I guess we are not a sexy pick for lack of a better word.Good. They had us finishing dead last last year.
Those were my first thoughts. Not sure on their rationale since we are starting the year with Hamels and a better BP than we started with last year. I guess we are not a sexy pick for lack of a better word.
I don't think they used anything but numbers. I think it highlights the weaknesses of overusing analytics. It seems they did the opposite of looking for a sexy pick. They seemed to have made a numbers cruncher's pick.Those were my first thoughts. Not sure on their rationale since we are starting the year with Hamels and a better BP than we started with last year. I guess we are not a sexy pick for lack of a better word.
I don't think they used anything but numbers. I think it highlights the weaknesses of overusing analytics. It seems they did the opposite of looking for a sexy pick. They seemed to have made a numbers cruncher's pick.