MilkSpiller22
Gorilla
One of the more egregious edges he had also was Iguodala over Ginobili, and I'm a huge Iguodala fan, seeing how important he is to the Warriors success. Ginobili is arguably a top 10 SG of all time, IMO.
His assessment matching up the two discounts how good Ginobili actually was on the court. He mentions that Iguodala's highest scoring out put is just over Ginobili's but didn't mention that Ginobili's came as a backup. In the 3 years he started more games than he came off the bench, two of them he made the All-star teams (2005 and 2011). That's 6 years in between all-star games. He didn't magically just get better in 2011, he was consistently the same player all those years in between. If he had been a starter he's easily a 7-8 time all-star over the course of his career.
Ginobili also made an All-NBA team as a BENCH PLAYER. Think about that. That's absurd. He also didn't even make the all-star team in that year either. Stoke used per 36 numbers in a lot of matchups, but didn't do so here. If you took both players per 36 numbers and match them up, Ginobili's is far and away better.
Ginobili is far and away the superior player to Iguodala.
but they are close enough that you expect someone selling his team would give his player the advantage...
If you are going to write a novel, then you are going to sell your team... You will POINT OUT every weakness the other team has and say that your players would take advantage of it...
For example, His Q4 has no scorers other than Bryant, mine has much better scorers... But somehow his defense is going to stop my offense so much that it will make Kobe Bryant Unstoppable...
Also, if you look at each quarter who gets the advantage, you see how he gives his advantages MUCH bigger than mine...