- Thread starter
- #61
Retroram52
Moderator
Kupp will go before Stafford. The Rams are trying to find a trade partner so they don't have to cut him. Otherwise they are going to have to pay Kupp $20 million for the remainder of the contract.
ewMcVay already is slightly pushing for Stafford to make a decision sooner rather tha later indicating that he and Snead are not going to wait forever. Garoppolo may be back if Stafford retires or wants traded.
I doubt we get a 2nd for Kupp, he's 32 and injury prone so a rebuilding team would do better to draft young WRs in those 1st 2 rounds and or send a 3rd or maybe 4th for Kupp.Well, with Vrabel back and one of our assistant coaches headed to New England, they could send the Rams a Second Rounder and/or a Third Rounder for Kupp.
Why Patriots should consider trading for former Super Bowl MVP
The New England Patriots have a lot of work to do in the offseason, and they'll have plenty of money to spend with $134 million in salary cap space. The Patriots need help in multiple areas, but one of the areas of weakness that have lingered the longest is at…www.yahoo.com
And as Tre White showed this season, signing a defender with that kind of injury history is bad news.Nah, dude already has an Achilles tear. Go the route of the draft and actually draft a decent blue chipper ILB for a change.
Rams named best landing spot for 49ers LB Dre Greenlaw in free agency
One of the biggest needs for the Los Angeles Rams this offseason is inside linebacker. Though Christian Rozeboom and Omar Speights had some positive moments in the second half of the year, it’s still a position that must be addressed in either free agency or the draft. If the…www.yahoo.com
I think many of these articles are put forth by bored sports writers with a case of winter blues, LTRF. There is no way in hell that McVay would lose his mind to the extent of wanting to bring in wimp like Daniel Jones. Garappolo is bad enough.What's up with the articles claiming that we will go after Daniel Jones in free agency? Seems pretty unlikely, though I suppose you never know.