I can see the confusion DAD. We have options at the safety position that are young and need to develop. If we had nothing, then you take a chance. Or if Tanard Jackson was an Ed Reed, you take a chance. Tanard Jackson at best is average (a couple of years ago). He doesn't bring youth, he doesn't bring exceptional talent, he does bring baggage with limited upside. The negatives outweigh the positives.
He's also already fucked us before. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
i dont see the fool me . i see it as forcing a rambo or gumbs to earn a job . i see jackson as a guy you bring in and if he wins great you take the 29 yr old and stabilize a position of need
you arent paying much for him either