- Thread starter
- #1
filosofy29
Back
Not the Dodgers!
Nope, they got Conforto insteadNot the Dodgers!
How is the Mets roster and farm club. With the way the Yankees have a steady supply of replacements and should be good for all of the term Soto signed for I don't have the conviction that the Mets will be good for more than two or three years of his contract. But I don't know if they (Mets) are better run now.
1M every 3 games.That’s a hell lot of money. Glad we were never part of that.
So he should have signed with the Dodgers???This just says a lot about Soto. He cares more about the money than winning.
Mets vs Philly and Atlanta will be fun. But none will get to the ws as long as the dodgers are there.
So he should have signed with the Dodgers???
He is a no question OMG player, who is only 26 years old, and is now on his 4th team.good question... i guess by some of my logic in that post, everyone should want to go to the dodgers...LOL...
but my point is that the mets still need a lot to compete with these teams, and there is a lot of potential ways for it to backfire... More so with the mets than other teams.... as the mets really dont have a good rotation yet... their offense is very solid, but they might not even resign Alonso...
Really the Yankees were the obvious choice for him to go to... and the Yankees were close in offer... so it was all about contract and not about winning...
To be fair, two of the teams traded him. Of course, it was because of the money, but he didn’t walk away from the teams and it wasn’t because of attitude (that I’m aware of)He is a no question OMG player, who is only 26 years old, and is now on his 4th team.
That tells me a LOT about the man.
2 teams had him and they realized that they COULD trade him. They didn’t look at him and decide that he was untradeable.To be fair, two of the teams traded him. Of course, it was because of the money, but he didn’t walk away from the teams and it wasn’t because of attitude (that I’m aware of)
2 teams had him and they realized that they COULD trade him. They didn’t look at him and decide that he was untradeable.
Fairwashington is not fair... but i get your point... and agree... but then again, maybe the fact that he has been on 3 teams already before now, is why he feels he has no loyalty to a team...
It is pretty much expected for teams like the Nationals to ship off any good player who is going to cost a lot really soon and ship off said player at the peak time (assumed peak time) to get the biggest return possible. It doesn't matter what kind of character that player is, he is going to get traded. Conventional wisdom dictates it.2 teams had him and they realized that they COULD trade him. They didn’t look at him and decide that he was untradeable.