- Thread starter
- #1
richig07
Well-Known Member
I am pretty damn confused.
The guy hasn't been able to walk without a limp for weeks, hasn't practiced, and then looks as gimpy and as ineffective as ever vs GB Sunday. In the post-game, Trestman indicates he thinks it may be time to give him a rest.
Then, today (Wednesday), the first practice of the week. Where generally any player that's even a tad hobbled sits out. He's out there in full action.
Well… alright then. I guess this is a good sign, but I don't know. I just think we actually may be able to win Sunday without him, and I much rather have him in full-health as we start to near November.
The guy hasn't been able to walk without a limp for weeks, hasn't practiced, and then looks as gimpy and as ineffective as ever vs GB Sunday. In the post-game, Trestman indicates he thinks it may be time to give him a rest.
Then, today (Wednesday), the first practice of the week. Where generally any player that's even a tad hobbled sits out. He's out there in full action.
Well… alright then. I guess this is a good sign, but I don't know. I just think we actually may be able to win Sunday without him, and I much rather have him in full-health as we start to near November.